Kugelblitz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2006
- Posts
- 287
You think that's sad, check out STL. TWA operated hundreds of flights/day in 2001 and now AA is down to like 34.
Just shows to go you, a hub without strong O & D traffic is no hub.
I would take you to task on that, my former colleague. A hub is what the parent company wants to make of it (and what it's lack of managment competency is incapable of). My current employer, CAL, has a huge base in IAH just a few miles from LUV. Do you really think it makes money? Do you think it will ever close? I doubt DFW is that big a money maker but if that is where the B.O.D.'s and the CEO want to live then guess what, the base remains open. Much like mainline service always is maintained where company execs live while RJ's fly into airports like O'hare. But don't you forget to shut down that APU!!!! We must save money, except where it would impinge on our corporate elites.
Don't be suckered by the corporate shell game. It is all statistical manipulation with one intention, to put as much money in their pocket and as little as possible in yours. The truth of the previous statement at this point should be self-evident.
If 'Open Skies' is fully realized, we may find that such airports as FLL and LGA don't make money either since none of the exec's who will be owning our airlines will live in the US (I fully expect the US ownership law someday to be repealed by our turncoat senators and congressman) and these may not figure into their international marketing schemes.