Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On Your Six said:Let's just face it, the CRJ/ERJ is a crappy aircraft from both an economics perspective and a passenger comfort perspective (nice bins and ultra-low, neck pain-inducing windows in the CRJ). Even though fares are low because of competition, passengers expect more in terms of comfort and quality and many business passenger willingly pay more to avoid cramped RJs. The E170/E190 completely obliterates the CRJ/ERJ in terms of comfort and economics.
Airlines that rely upon either the CRJ or ERJ are destined to have serious problems if more comfortable and economic alternatives (like the E170) become more widely flown. That's just the way it is... These RJs will only do well if they are placed on non-LCC competitive routes and they feed a hub where higher fares can be justified (e.g., service from Salt Lake to Pasco or ATL to Newburgh). Placing them in service up against E170s or LCCs (e.g., AirTran 717s) would not be sensible if the airlines want to keep their best customers.
Has Comair finalized its order for E170s or is that still "up in the air"?
That wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that... they're WORE THE FARK OUT, would it?? Some of these RJ's have been ridden extremely hard and put to bed very wet since the day they were delivered. They were never intended for this "level of service."FDJ2 said:[FONT=Tahoma, Verdana, Lucida] As we pointed out at our recent Forecast Conference, look for around 200 (CRJs and ERJs) to find themselves enjoying retirement over the next three years.[/FONT]