Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Continenal Express

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Superpilot92 said:
Then they lose money because of what they own of XJET and the amount they have invested in a good product. Believe it or not we have a good relationship with CAL and why would they want to jack with something that is working. just my thoughts.

All because it works now does not mean it will work forever.

COEX makes up a large part of CAL operation. In coming months CAL could possibly be competing against alot of it's peers with a very unfair advantage. Delta in Bankruptcy........Northwest in Bankruptcy.......United in Bankruptcy..........US Airways in bankruptcy or out of it with a new streamlined (ra.ped from employees) cost structure.

Are 135's and 145's the best money making machines in the business right now? Maybe on some routes, but Hol.y he.ll does CAL do everything with those things.

Delta, USAir, and Northwest all have airlines that they own 100% of, but they don't even get 100% of the business....they've all diversified.

Anyway......I'm starting to sound like I'm trying to prove a point that I'm not really trying to prove.

COEX is an awesome regional, we all know it's not going anywhere, but is it going to be the airline that gets you from the very bottom of a very large list to somewhere that your comfortable with.....if your starting over you have to look at the present day operation and it's potential:

1.)I think the EMB-135/145, CRJ-200 has the potential to be the next plane everyone is trying to operate less of.

2.) I think CAL will most likey follow the way of everyone else and diversify their carriers...when they do so no new carrier will be buying more 50 seat aircraft.

Piker
 
Last edited:
Can anyone tell me if there is any difference in the interviews between those with current 121 jobs and the rest of the applicants? If so, what is the difference?
 
AV1ATRX said:
Can anyone tell me if there is any difference in the interviews between those with current 121 jobs and the rest of the applicants? If so, what is the difference?

Depends, are you a male or female, are you black or white?
 
CommuterHell said:
Does anyone know where to find the gouge for the interview. In addition, I would like to know what they ask 121 applicants.

What airline are you coming from if you don't mind me asking. Your profile says you have flown the 145. MESA?
 
Those who have 121 or 135 experiance their application gets viewed at quicker than those whom dont.
 
E170Guppykiller said:
I think that RAH will get a big piece of the CAL pie come 2007. Bring on the growth!
Guppiewadgobbler,
The only growth you will see is the small increase in your boyfriends vienna sausage size due the incompetent, but enthusiastic gumming you perform upon him, in between pretzel vending and coke spilling.
Now go back to your galley area and clean that cart.
PBR
 
E170Guppykiller said:
I think that RAH will get a big piece of the CAL pie come 2007. Bring on the growth!

I could be wrong, but I believe CAL scope says anything over 50 seats will be flown by CAL...
 
tgz2 said:
You could be wrong...but you aren't...100% correct...anything bigger than 50 seats goes to CAL.

Correct, for right now(in the hubs). Maybe not when CAL comes a beggin again.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom