Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sim ride: ACA, Compass
No sim ride: Skyway, Comair
AirTran doesn't do a sim ride, either.
You can go to www.congress.gov or www.senate.gov and both sites will link you to the http://thomas.loc.gov site where you can search all legislation, including all the changes it went through during the process (adding riders, removing and changing language, etc). You can even search by keyword within the system which is a very cool feature for finding exactly what you need.
As far as I can tell, they're going to be pushing for the House vote on this by the beginning of September, sending it to the Senate, vote by the beginning of October, hopefully signed by the President by Halloween, if not Thanksgiving.
It doesn't say sim ride. Basically, it says "Access the person's aviation experience". Doesn't say use a sim, this is left to interpretation.
Not saying it's good or bad, just saying that it doesn't sound to me to make a simulator mandatory.
DAL does some phycho test, I'm sure they will justify that.
SWA does a situational interview (like an Emergency procedure "stand-up")
This rule will change nothing.
The only rule that will require management to get a work around it the ATP requirement. They will find a way.
This legislation will pass because it changes nothing. Standard ops for our legislature. A whole lot of hot air which amounts to nothing.
And wow, a year to implement crew rest changes. This is asking for a lawsuit. The Government acknowledges there is something potentially unsafe regarding airline rest requirements, but then allows this to go on for another year.
I've never understood how the military and the FAA are both run by the government, but as far as flying, they have different rules.
Duty time should be 12 hours max, and minimum rest should be 12 hours after a duty day. Simple.
This will change nothing as it stands. The FAA changes which might get implemented some day were the only real hope.
Also commissions the National Academy of Sciences to study...
Unlikely.No crew rest requirement will change the fact that said F/O on Colgan flight commuted in from the west coast on a Redeye and worked the very same day. Maybe the next legislation is going to be living in base....
It's better this way. You don't want congress making the rest rule changes, what the hell do they know about it? Nothing. There giving it to the FAA to make the right changes as it should be. More than likely they'll take care of all those duty hour regs and such that everyone wants. Hey I'm furloughed too and want to go back just as bad as the next guy out on the street, and so I'm glad the FAA is handling this and not the other way around. Tougher rest rules will require more staffing. If they implement new rules by the beginning of next summer, then the airlines will be forced to recall and have everyone trained BEFORE the rule is in place.
I listened to the webcast. The subcommittee is chartering a study of commuting for later review. It won't make this bill but they are going to gather research and look at it.
I still fail to see how they could regulate commuting other than (God forbid) to take away the jumpseat.
But that does not take away pass riding or driving long distances. Even if there was some way to regulate that a pilot "live" within a certain distance of their base, crashpad addresses, or a friends address could skirt around that.
And how are you going to regulate compensating someone who has to live in New York City?
I just do not think it is feasable or practical.