TristarJS30
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
- Posts
- 114
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based on What?100-150 is a more realistic number.
Which begs the question, "If they are supposedly announcing furlough numbers, then why spend the money with another new hire class?"
Based on What?
I was just curious if that was a figure from management. I'd figure if mangement gave you a number, to double it. Management doesn't need to create a bigger then necessary exodus by announcing accurate figures, so I figured they'd give a low ball figure to the pilot groupJust my personal opinion. So you know it's the truth because I posted it.![]()
Management doesn't need to create a bigger then necessary exodus by announcing accurate figures, so I figured they'd give a low ball figure to the pilot group
My line of thinking is that they don't want to find themselves in a pilot shortage i.e. they anounce 300 furloughs and 450 pilots end up leaving...then they need to put more money into training costsWhy not? If they start a "bigger than necessary" exodus, the furlough problem might just resolve itself.
My line of thinking is that they don't want to find themselves in a pilot shortage i.e. they anounce 300 furloughs and 450 pilots end up leaving...then they need to put more money into training costs
"Management doesn't need to create a bigger then necessary exodus by announcing accurate figures"
An exodus to where? Home Depot?
Perhaps. What are other line pilots thinking? Are people expecting to weather the furloughs? Or are people getting antsy with the DAL/NWA merger? The 2 airlines don't need 6 feeders and the NWA feeders are cheaper to operate, right?Well, then if they announce 150, 300 will leave and the situation will still resolve itself.
Where ever your Plan B, C, or D is.An exodus to where? Home Depot?
How long did those furloughs last? I didnt think we ever furloughed before.