Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Comair sues FAA, Lexington airport

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The night you make your first speech as president, I'm going drunk driving on a mission...to see how many mini-vans with baby on board stickers I can P.I.T. manuver into rolling. Lawsuit reform, bring it on!

I'd say that's a little extreme but these days, the drunk driver would sue the mini-van driver and friggin win a couple million....

"The mini-van was in my way your honor" :rolleyes:
 
I'd say that's a little extreme but these days, the drunk driver would sue the mini-van driver and friggin win a couple million....

"The mini-van was in my way your honor" :rolleyes:

While it does seem that civil cases end in lottery sized winnings to the those who filed cases and won, I think that if you had the statistics on what people actually received in all civil cases, it might be surprisingly lower than what you think.

If someone suffers a loss at the actions of another, the only way you can argue the facts surrounding such a loss, is in civil court...the criminal courts are not the place for such an argument.

In addition, since government printed money is the legal tender in this country, it would be pretty extreme that a husband that lost a wife in a car accident of someone else's fault be made to accept one of the defendant's daughters or wife in exchange for the loss...regardless of how comely they may be.

The intent of civil courts was to keep society civilized. Without them, a person would only have personal vengeance to turn to. While it would be interesting to read about multiple daily shotgun massacres in the newspapers, most people would agree that would not be the most civilized method for airing grievances with other people.

In addition, with a civil trial, you have the two adversaries presenting their side of the story in front of an impartial finder of fact and a jury. Believe me, juries are typically persons who think people "just sue for money"...so it isn't the free ride on the money train you might think it is.
 
Last edited:
Are you saying I don't know that the crew lined up on the wrong runway? Pretty indisputable fact. Can't help you on the open heart surgery or the fuel injection on an F1 car. I did find this one little regulation that might help you out though. It's kinda' like a law. (kinda' like means similar)

Title 14: Aeronautics and Space
PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES
Subpart A—General

§ 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command.

(a) The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.


So, the airport has issues. A lot of airports have issues. Why do you view this as some personal attack when it isn't? People screw up, they make mistakes. It happens all the time. This time it was tragic. Are there mitigating factors? Sure. But the crew is still, in the end, the one that lined up on the wrong runway and didn't catch their mistake.

What are you like 80 years old? The United States and parts of the rest of the world realized somewhere around 1970 that you can't merely blame the pilot because it's the easy thing to do. You can ALWAYS logically blame the pilots in some way in every accident because the Captain is ALWAYS responsible, if everyone had your attitude we would still be killing people by the hundreds every year.

Later,
 
accident of someone else's fault be made to accept one of the defendant's daughters or wife in exchange for the loss...regardless of how comely they may be..


Now we're talking, I'm going driving, anyone want to come along. I'm headed to a local college!!!! HOT BLOND CHICKS
 
I am incredibly surprised by the reaction of this thread.

As mentioned earlier, of course the captain is responsible. Everyone knows that. On the other hand, it generally takes more than one factor to have an accident.

I agree 100% with the lawsuit against the FAA and the airport. Sometimes a lawsuit is one of the only tools we can use to change a beauracratic outfit like the FAA. Once again the captain was in command and responsible, but you better believe that airport management and the FAA shared responsibility in this.

It doesn't take a genius to know that you don't need a final report to determine this. Common sense will tell us that there should have been two controllers. Even the FAA has already admitted this. The same goes for airport signage and advisories, among many other factors.
 
COMAIR might have a case if they can prove neglegence on the part of the County for improper signage and any confusing NOTAMs concerning Taxiway changes. The Jury will not be made up of aviation professionals but people who know little about our industry.
 
What are you like 80 years old? The United States and parts of the rest of the world realized somewhere around 1970 that you can't merely blame the pilot because it's the easy thing to do. You can ALWAYS logically blame the pilots in some way in every accident because the Captain is ALWAYS responsible, if everyone had your attitude we would still be killing people by the hundreds every year.

Later,

What are you, like 2 years old. Where did I say the flight crew is responsible for every accident. There are still accidents caused by catastrophic mechanical failures, weather, and other unforeseeable events. This wasn't the case in Lexington.
 
How long was those taxiways changes underway? Did Comair stop flying into the airport at night when these were taking place?

No other crew made this mistake, or if they did, they caught it, this crew did not and people died. It has been a while since I have been into LEX, but from what I have read, the two runways are still remarkably different in appearance, even at night.

Yes, there were only one controller, yet most of us currently operate or have operated at airports where there are no controllers. Who do we blame then if there was a mishap, the airport manager, his dog?

Yes, perhaps there are issues with signage, or markings or whatever, they might all be included into the lawsuit, but the biggest issue here, is the two pilots, that for whatever reason, tried to take off from a runway that was too short.
 
I cant believe that that there are professional pilots who really believe that there is anyone other than the PIC /SIC to blame for this tragic accident. This accident didnt happen because there was only 1 controller/construction ect...
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top