General Lee said:
Fins,
How would you win again if we left ALPA and created our own union?
Our fight is for
representation, issues like scope are the effect, not the cause of our problem. If DALPA left ALPA it is likely the barriers to effective representation of our interests would be removed because ALPA would no longer be held captive to the wishes of the Delta MEC. If you took NW with you, all the better. Then the inner ALPA political establishment wishing for the destruction of ASA and Comair would be gone.
General Lee said:
Our contract would still be valid (since LEO signed it)---and the scope would still be in place, with you looking for more people to blame.
Would it? Re-read the "Recognition and Scope" section of your contract. Delta has a contract with ALPA, who represents the Delta pilots. Absent ALPA, there is no agreement. But who cares - Delta wants to renegotiate your entire contract anyway, right? With effective representation, the ASA and Comair pilots would participate in contract 2005 and the outcome would be shaped by all the interests represented at the table.
General Lee said:
ALPA would be bankrupt, leaving you with no real representation....I have to admit though, I am not familiar with a lot of the things you say about ALPA and the funds overseas etc....
If a group leaves ALPA, they leave whatever funds they have paid. So the war chest remains. But it brings up an interesting point.
If we look at ALPA's financial history, the union has only been close to bankruptcy once in modern times - this was the litigation over how ALPA handled the Pan Am merger, which both your MEC and Mike Haber (RJDC's Counsel) were directly involved in. My understanding is that ALPA actually sold their building in Herndon, VA to pay their voluntary settlement of the claims brought by Haber. After Haber's good claims were settled, ALPA fought and eventually won the remaining claims that were brought by different attorneys. The settlement was confidential and that confidentiality has been honored by both sides, but we do know it was in the 8 figure range. A lot of money back then.
You add to that settlement the cases like
Miller v. ALPA and other messes the Delta MEC has got ALPA into and the number may be as high as 50 to 100 milllion in off the books legal settlements for everything from representational issues to hanky panky in the DAL MEC apartments. We don't know where the money goes because it is not on your MEC's budget - legal settlements and costs are MCF's. So - do we know that the Delta MEC carries its own weight? We know that DALPA does nothing on the cheap and the after a strike, the next most expensive activity ALPA engages in is mainline contract negotiations.
After the Pan Am suit that involved the DAL MEC, ALPA has worked to insulate its war chest from legal judgements by moving the money into off shore investment and insurance arrangements.
Flying the Line III will be interesting, because aside from the "Ra Ra - we got Continental back" the real action has pretty much all involved the Delta MEC. Your group of crazies has done stuff nobody has dared to try before, assembled the best contract in the entire history of the piloting profession and acquired two airlines without merging them. Illegal as heck in many ways, but willing to boldly break the law, pay the price and keep going like a military machine.
Of course all of this Delta leaving ALPA stuff is conjecture. Delta is not leaving ALPA, it would be a foolish move and collectively, your pilots are a pretty smart group. You are not going to hand us the keys. But seriously, if you have the choice of obeying the law, or leaving, you would vote to leave? If so, that explains ALPA's core problem - ALPA is run by pilots who have no allegiance to ALPA.
~~~^~~~