To Captainv Part 2 of 3
Besides that, it happens that the Delta pilots are the ONLY airline pilots that constantly remind Comair pilots of how much they "gave" and how much they "helped". They make it sound as if their "giving" and their "helping", such as it was, created an obligation to them and them alone, that surpasses our obligations to all the other pilot groups that gave and helped and who, by the way, never remind us of the fact. Sorry my friend, but that's extremely tacky. I don't blame every Delta pilot for doing that because every Delta pilot is not doing that, but enough of them are to make it quite clear that is their collective thought process. It is how they think. The American pilots have a lot of folks on furlough too and so do the UAL pilots. USAirways has more than anyone else does. How come none of them are reminding us of how much they helped, how much they gave, how much we "owe them", and demanding preferential treatment. How come? My guess is that if the Comair leadership had known (during our strike) that the mandatory assessments paid by Delta pilots and the donations "given" by a handful (out of 10,000) of Delta pilots would later be used in an effort to buy influence with the Comair MEC, they would probably have been told to keep their money.
They also remind us constantly that "they didn't fly struck work." Well, neither did anyone else. Is that supposed to be "special"? Based on what they say now, it is pretty evident that they didn't fly struck work because they didn't want to be called Scabs. It had nothing to do with wanting to "help" us. When you "help" somebody out of good will, you don't remind him or her all the time and you don't call it "help" when in fact you are merely fulfilling an obligation or covering your own a$$. Maybe you think what the Delta pilots are saying is "cool" Captainv, but I don't. I say again, I think it's tacky and cheap (that's what I can write on here. If you could read my mind you'd know what I really think of it.).
I'm sorry about your personal friend Captainv and yes it does "suck", but as you yourself point out, that is the business we're all in. You take your chances and hope that you make the right choices. Sometimes you do and other times you get furloughed; still other times your airline goes out of business completely. We should always regret when that happens to anyone and I do. I've been furloughed myself and I've had more than one airline go out of business and pull the rug from under me. I don't expect any special treatment because of it and I've never reminded any pilot group of how much I paid in assessments on their behalf over the years. I hope you won't do that either if it should ever happen to you. As for the level of their alleged support, that is also a matter of opinion. If you listen to them you might believe we could not have had a strike but for the "support" of the Delta pilots. They can believe that if they so choose, but I know different and I think it's laughable and unadulterated BS. They did what was required of them and, with rare individual exception, nothing more. No medal; no "T"-shirt.
The union dues and what they are is not important. That's not why I wrote to you at all, it just gave me a chance to say something. What bothers me was that fact that you appear to support a pilot from another airline in preference to your fellow pilots from your own airline who make up your MEC, and many hundreds more who agree with our MEC and support it.
I have no problem whatever with you or any other Comair pilot that disagrees with our MEC. That is not only your right, it is your responsibility whenever you feel that your MEC is not acting in the interests of Comair pilots. Let me say that again so that it is absolutely clear -- not acting in the interests of Comair pilots. NOT Delta pilots, Comair pilots.
When you decide to disagree with your MEC, (which I have often done myself) it should be after you have all the facts and you clearly understand why the MEC made a particular decision. IMO, your decision should not be based on political rhetoric from a bunch of outsiders, especially Delta pilots whose interests are in direct conflict with ours. If you still disagree, then by all means you should voice that opinion. With all due respect, in this case I do not think you have all the facts, neither do you appear to understand fully the reasons for our MEC's decision. I urge you to consult with the members of our MEC and ask them why they made that decision. I am confident they will tell you and explain it to the best of their ability. Have you done that? When things are not crystal clear to you, as a Comair pilot, which is what you are, I would expect you to put greater trust in your fellow Comair pilots than you do in the pilots of another airline. Especially when the best interests of that airline's pilots is in direct conflict with the best interests of your own pilot group. Your real "brothers" are Comair pilots first and foremost. Comair pilots are the one's who will give their all to support and help you when the chips are down. If you don't learn anything else while you're here, please learn that.
I don't expect you to take my word for anything, sir. As a matter of fact I don't want you to do that and it would upset me just as much, if not more, if you did. Comair pilots are not "yes men". You are one of us now, and I sure don't want you to become a "yes" man. I certainly don't have all the answers Captainv and I never will. Yes, I know you're "new" and I'm not "new" but, I once was new and I haven't forgotten. That doesn't make me smarter than you are. I'm not a Delta pilot and I will never be, but guess what -- being a Delta pilot doesn't make them smarter than you or me either. What I would ask you to do is investigate and explore the evidence, whatever the issue may be. That way you will find your own answers to the questions. I'm willing to bet there will be little, if any, disagreement between us once you do and you really understand what is happening here.
Continued in Part 3
Besides that, it happens that the Delta pilots are the ONLY airline pilots that constantly remind Comair pilots of how much they "gave" and how much they "helped". They make it sound as if their "giving" and their "helping", such as it was, created an obligation to them and them alone, that surpasses our obligations to all the other pilot groups that gave and helped and who, by the way, never remind us of the fact. Sorry my friend, but that's extremely tacky. I don't blame every Delta pilot for doing that because every Delta pilot is not doing that, but enough of them are to make it quite clear that is their collective thought process. It is how they think. The American pilots have a lot of folks on furlough too and so do the UAL pilots. USAirways has more than anyone else does. How come none of them are reminding us of how much they helped, how much they gave, how much we "owe them", and demanding preferential treatment. How come? My guess is that if the Comair leadership had known (during our strike) that the mandatory assessments paid by Delta pilots and the donations "given" by a handful (out of 10,000) of Delta pilots would later be used in an effort to buy influence with the Comair MEC, they would probably have been told to keep their money.
They also remind us constantly that "they didn't fly struck work." Well, neither did anyone else. Is that supposed to be "special"? Based on what they say now, it is pretty evident that they didn't fly struck work because they didn't want to be called Scabs. It had nothing to do with wanting to "help" us. When you "help" somebody out of good will, you don't remind him or her all the time and you don't call it "help" when in fact you are merely fulfilling an obligation or covering your own a$$. Maybe you think what the Delta pilots are saying is "cool" Captainv, but I don't. I say again, I think it's tacky and cheap (that's what I can write on here. If you could read my mind you'd know what I really think of it.).
I'm sorry about your personal friend Captainv and yes it does "suck", but as you yourself point out, that is the business we're all in. You take your chances and hope that you make the right choices. Sometimes you do and other times you get furloughed; still other times your airline goes out of business completely. We should always regret when that happens to anyone and I do. I've been furloughed myself and I've had more than one airline go out of business and pull the rug from under me. I don't expect any special treatment because of it and I've never reminded any pilot group of how much I paid in assessments on their behalf over the years. I hope you won't do that either if it should ever happen to you. As for the level of their alleged support, that is also a matter of opinion. If you listen to them you might believe we could not have had a strike but for the "support" of the Delta pilots. They can believe that if they so choose, but I know different and I think it's laughable and unadulterated BS. They did what was required of them and, with rare individual exception, nothing more. No medal; no "T"-shirt.
The union dues and what they are is not important. That's not why I wrote to you at all, it just gave me a chance to say something. What bothers me was that fact that you appear to support a pilot from another airline in preference to your fellow pilots from your own airline who make up your MEC, and many hundreds more who agree with our MEC and support it.
I have no problem whatever with you or any other Comair pilot that disagrees with our MEC. That is not only your right, it is your responsibility whenever you feel that your MEC is not acting in the interests of Comair pilots. Let me say that again so that it is absolutely clear -- not acting in the interests of Comair pilots. NOT Delta pilots, Comair pilots.
When you decide to disagree with your MEC, (which I have often done myself) it should be after you have all the facts and you clearly understand why the MEC made a particular decision. IMO, your decision should not be based on political rhetoric from a bunch of outsiders, especially Delta pilots whose interests are in direct conflict with ours. If you still disagree, then by all means you should voice that opinion. With all due respect, in this case I do not think you have all the facts, neither do you appear to understand fully the reasons for our MEC's decision. I urge you to consult with the members of our MEC and ask them why they made that decision. I am confident they will tell you and explain it to the best of their ability. Have you done that? When things are not crystal clear to you, as a Comair pilot, which is what you are, I would expect you to put greater trust in your fellow Comair pilots than you do in the pilots of another airline. Especially when the best interests of that airline's pilots is in direct conflict with the best interests of your own pilot group. Your real "brothers" are Comair pilots first and foremost. Comair pilots are the one's who will give their all to support and help you when the chips are down. If you don't learn anything else while you're here, please learn that.
I don't expect you to take my word for anything, sir. As a matter of fact I don't want you to do that and it would upset me just as much, if not more, if you did. Comair pilots are not "yes men". You are one of us now, and I sure don't want you to become a "yes" man. I certainly don't have all the answers Captainv and I never will. Yes, I know you're "new" and I'm not "new" but, I once was new and I haven't forgotten. That doesn't make me smarter than you are. I'm not a Delta pilot and I will never be, but guess what -- being a Delta pilot doesn't make them smarter than you or me either. What I would ask you to do is investigate and explore the evidence, whatever the issue may be. That way you will find your own answers to the questions. I'm willing to bet there will be little, if any, disagreement between us once you do and you really understand what is happening here.
Continued in Part 3