DenverDude2002
Ramp Rat
- Joined
- May 17, 2003
- Posts
- 590
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good school for education....bad school for football. Saw them play Clemson last year. I bet it took them the rest of the season to recover from that one.Paladin said:GO PALADINS!!!!
They play Clemson every year and always lose, but 9 out of 10 years are ranked in the top 25 Div 1-AA. Not bad for a rather small school (2600 vs Clemson's 16000). 1988 national champions.gear_guy said:Good school for education....bad school for football. Saw them play Clemson last year. I bet it took them the rest of the season to recover from that one.
You're not allowed to use statistics that old. Nobody remembers them.wrigley23 said:1988 national champions.![]()
Oh please, if it were'nt for 2002, you'd have to go back to 1970. I'm sure people still talk about the Hayes era in Buckeye country.JetPilot_Mike said:You're not allowed to use statistics that old. Nobody remembers them.
Most people talk about how stupid Clarett is, and how much Cooper sucked. OSU should have won at least 2 championships under Cooper, but he didn't know how to coach.wrigley23 said:Oh please, if it were'nt for 2002, you'd have to go back to 1970. I'm sure people still talk about the Hayes era in Buckeye country.
Anything, and I mean ANYTHING except UCLA......and then Notre Dame, in that order!!!!!!!!!!!! ;-)Sir Humpalot said:I would say go Stanford, but we suckkk in football. But atleast we have basketball, if we can ever get past the second round. But atleast we have hot girls on campus, but again they are not that good looking compared to other schools. But atleast the degree looks nice on the wall, but again its just sitting there collecting dust. But atleast more millionaires and ceo's come from stanford, but again i am just a cfi.
It could be worse, i could have went to cal (uc berkely), ucla, or arizona.
You're right...no one cares.Sir Humpalot said:Yeah, ucla sux. Heres my prediction for the pac 10 but i dont think anyone cares. 1. usc 2. cal 3. oregon .....9. stanford
Hell yeah I care when it comes to the Pac 10!! Cal is gonna be good this year with Aaron Rodgers and his aerial attack. Oregon will be good too, but you forgot Oregon State!! You gotta hand it to the Beavers this year, they dropped Temple (which is what they scheduled for their first game) and picked up LSU on Sept 4th. That is some big, and I mean huge cajones!! Should be a good game! With the loss of running back Steve Jackson it will be up to Derek Anderson to lead the attack. Anderson threw over 4000 yds last year, but had 24 interceptions too. Correct the INT's and you have a Heisman caliber QB!! It's kind of hard to think of the Beavers as a powerhouse cuz they've sucked for so so long, but pending how they play Cal and Oregon, they could be fighting for the #2 spot in the PAC 10.Sir Humpalot said:Yeah, ucla sux. Heres my prediction for the pac 10 but i dont think anyone cares. 1. usc 2. cal 3. oregon .....9. stanford
Are you on CRACK?!?! We lost to Clemson 28-17 and were in 'relative' control of the game for the entire 1st half. What game were YOU watching?gear_guy said:Good school for education....bad school for football. Saw them play Clemson last year. I bet it took them the rest of the season to recover from that one.
IAA---exactly....who cares?Paladin said:We're consistently ranked in the top 20 IAA every year... Yeah, FU sucks for football![]()
Cheers.
All right a fellow Trojan!! FIGHT ON!!Pistonpilot said:Here's another vote for USC from a So Cal native.
Get used to hearing Leinart to Williams--Touchdown USC!!!
That's if the NCAA lets him come back.
And when exactly has MTSU done anything in sports? Bueller....Bueller....gear_guy said:IAA---exactly....who cares?
Go Alcorn State Whoohoo!