Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Colemill Enterprises,M88 Nashville,2nd post

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
To pilotman121

At this late date no one on this thread or the other one concerning this operator have disputed any of the allegations made.So I reiterate,the allegations must be true!!!!!!!!!
 
Colemill Enterprises

Does anyone know if the pilot from Minnesota was ever hired,if so does he still work there or has he gone back home?
 
Last edited:
Minnesota Pilot

If this is true Colemill Enterprises must really be hard up for pilots,maybe he will last longer there than some of his previous flying jobs.
 
truth hurts

this place is shady.

The KingAir 200 requires far more landing distance than the Part 135 60% available at M88. Everytime these people fill that KingAir up and land pax at that airport...

But what do I know...
 
how to make money in aviation

I have lived in Nashville all my life.
Lotta funny things have gone on
A name popped up at the Colemill Enterprises website.

Cant quite place it...
I KNOW I have heard it before...
hmmm...


C&D
 
To htbrks

You are probably thinking about Mr.RB, who has been known to do crazy things and actually lives at the "Fort" M88.
 
G-force

I would say you are corrrect, Minnesota Pilot would try to live at the airport FBO like Mr.RB unless the FAA would have a place for him to stay.
 
Last edited:
No more openings

Colemill is not hiring at this time. Sorry G-man. Things are cooking along just fine. Flying is good and life is good. I'm happy right here. See ya "G." or cooldude, or 138 guy, whatever you call yourself these days.
 
So Colemill isn't hiring eh? I met a Colemill guy the other day at FTY.. Said they were hiring.. Ohh well..

BTW.. Gforce, I thought you were a CP somewhere, why don't you relax and act like one?
 
Colemill Enterprises!

I have determined that this site is getting boring and it is time to move on to better subjects.The site is not worth writting about anymore, everyone knows that the place is worthless cause.Thanks for your entertainment!
 
Last edited:
to g-force

For once i actually agree with g-force. It must have been a bottom feeder company if they let him work there! If he still needs help starting a king-air i would be glad to help, since he isn't able to fly them!
 
Last edited:
Who is this we're talking about? ;)
 
Hey Jone.
Hate to burst your bubble on the 60% rule, but it DOES apply, ipso defacto reference by large 135 aircraft being refered in subpart to a previous chapter.
I wont inflate my presence here in correcting you, how about we give BNA FSDO a ringy dingy and we'll go from there. Im sure RB would love to hop in on the discussion...
UNLESS a provision has been issued by your POI allowing an exemption... But I REALLY doubt that ANYONE from M88 would go near the gold building much less call them on the telephone.
 
Colemill Enterprises,M88

htbrks said:
Hey Jone.
Hate to burst your bubble on the 60% rule, but it DOES apply, ipso defacto reference by large 135 aircraft being refered in subpart to a previous chapter.
I wont inflate my presence here in correcting you, how about we give BNA FSDO a ringy dingy and we'll go from there. Im sure RB would love to hop in on the discussion...
UNLESS a provision has been issued by your POI allowing an exemption... But I REALLY doubt that ANYONE from M88 would go near the gold building much less call them on the telephone.
If this company was located around our FSDO, they would of gotten busted and shut down.All the FAA would have to do is monitor there flights,passengers and load manifest.This would be a pretty easy violation to prove.
 
Last edited:
60% rule @ M88

You definitely do not want RB involved in any discussion with BNA FSDO inspectors over this 60% rule concerning 135 operations at M88.
 
Colemill Enterprises

G-force said:
You definitely do not want RB involved in any discussion with BNA FSDO inspectors over this 60% rule concerning 135 operations at M88.
Can you say certificate action!
 
OK, I am unfamiliar with 135 regs.. what is the 60% rule?
 
To sprinfieldjone

Your boys are unruly,undisciplined,uncouth,and in need of something they did not recieve when they were in school.Maybe you should evaluate the ENTIRE FLIGHT DEPT at the FORT and determine who needs GROUND SCHOOL on how to conduct themselves as a PROFESSIONAL PILOT!!!!!!!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom