Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Coke

  • Thread starter Thread starter 400A
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 16

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Done it many times

Gearmunky said:
We start the whining and crying?? YOU and your 10,000 hour club started your bellyaching of how absurd it was to put a low time guy in the right seat. All I was saying is it's pretty unprofessional especially, ESPECIALLY, coming from a chief pilot, to judge someone on the numbers and not the skill. It's real nice to know that if someone wants to get hired with you they gotta have 5000 hours to fly a Beechjet (no detriment or offense to the skill of Beechjet pilots at all, whatsoever.)

I believe that you should give back to something that you take out of. Remember you wouldn't be where you are if your coffee friends didn't give you a break in a King Air. If you've been lucky to be where you are and your such a great "god of the air" put someone who needs a chance in the right seat, since your attitude suggests that you could fly the thing solo anyway.

Now if you will excuse me, I'm leaving on a trip in our G-IV and I'm taking my 784 hour logbook with me.

Nice talking to you, Fly Safe!!!

I have done that pal. If fact my current number 1 Captain was hired around 1700 hours. We bought him his ATP and Typed him, but he started out in the King Air. I have given many low time guys their first turbine job. But not 700 hours in a Gulfstream.

Also never said anything about needing 5000 hours to fly a Beechjet. Again you put words in peoples mouths.

And yes as Chief Pilot I do have to set a minimum for pilot applicants. Its all about safety. I am responsible for the safety of our operation. That does not include doing instruction while my boss or charter customers are in the back. I need a guy experienced enough to recognise if any captain has made a mistake, and correct it.

As for your claim of me thinking I am some sort of God of the Air, Those who know me would tell you the exact opposite. All flights are conducted with the most stringent crew coordination. Any pilot can stop any mission at any time. not just the Captain. We also seat swap every other leg. No radio opperators in my shop. When I had King Airs in my operation we even flew them 2 pilot 90 percent of the time.

By the way, I would actually consider a 800-1000 hour guy in the beechjet, if I knew him and his ability level, its not hard to fly. But never in a G4.

As far as your 784 hour log book, I cant help but notice you have not passed a type ride. That alone tells me something.... Tells me you are more than likely serving the drinks in the back...or you cant pass a type ride... which would prove our point. Cheers
 
a line has to be drawn eventually

Gearmunky,



I think the issue that most flight department managers or CP's face is between their own comfort level, insurance, and safety, you have to eventually draw a line. That line, without some form of amplifying information, must serve as your first evaluation, or shred out point for resumes. One could never get through the interview process with resumes if the assumption is made that every resume, regardless of hours is a sterling example of professional aviation.



You look to develop a starting point that affords the hiring manger(s) the best opportunity to place the best possible sample of applicants in the office/hangar for interviews and hopefully hiring.



Again, I think eventually you will have to look to the middle ground if the argument can end. You may indeed be that example of aviation excellence, however, in a vacuum one can not begin to believe that most low time drivers posses the same acumen that 3000, 4000, 5000 hour pilots have available to them.



I believe each of us is fiercely protective of the experience we have developed, as the experience we posses, and the ratings in our pockets are the only commodity we carry in this industry. I appreciate and understand the type "A" confidence that most everyone in our trade exudes. However, that same confidence can also be the attribute that degrades the competence, proficiency, and safety in the cockpit if misapplied. I digress.



Having digressed and rambled, I believe I will highjack this and mention that I am headed to Brazilian BBQ, a glass of wine, and will look forward to reading more after I get back. – nothing like a BBQ reference, whatever happened to those-



Otter
 
Last edited:
Again,,, Well Said Otter

Speaking of BBQ, Its about time for another trip to Miklebobs (APF) YUMMM:)
 
High vs. Low Time:

It has been my experience that time in type (aircraft, environmental, geographical) and other factors directly related to the job are more important than "log book" time. Having said that, "log book" time and ratings are a means to start the process.

I once interviewed a young pilot for a position and he, very nice fellow that he was, had nowhere near what we needed. However, he was so eager to please and willing to listen that I spelled out what he would need for our position, and asked him to call me periodically with his progress…never thinking I would ever hear from him again.

Time passed and he kept calling, adding one by one the items I said he would need. To make a long story short we eventually hired him and he has made a great pilot.

So what am I saying...sell your self with more than your "time" and "ratings", know the job your after...what they do, where they do it, and as much information as you can find about the company. In this day in time you can build quite a portfolio of information before you get your first interview.

Good luck to all.
 
Otter said:
Having digressed and rambled, I believe I will highjack this and mention that I am headed to Brazilian BBQ, a glass of wine, and will look forward to reading more after I get back. – nothing like a BBQ reference, whatever happened to those-

YOU SUCK! I don't have any decent Brazilian BBQ places near me! I have to get my Brazilian fix(both BBQ and women) while on the road! :D
 
Dep676 said:
Hey GV. Not to start the great debate here again about the Global and the GV. What does the Gv do for numbers? How much more range does it have than the Global? I thought they were both close in numbers. I don't want all the bashers to pipe in either. I just want to know the difference between the two aircraft.

The short answer is that the G550 will fly 250 nm farther than the Global Express XRS while using 3,650 lbs less fuel or 615 nm farther than the straight Global Express using 2,000 lbs less fuel.

The following data are based on 8 passengers, ISA, NBAA Reserves.

G550

LRC: M 0.80 - 6,750 nm.

Intermediate Cruise: M 0.83 - 6,500 nm.

Normal Cruise: M 0.85 - 6,000 nm.

High Speed Cruise: M 0.87 - 5,000 nm.

Thrust: BR 710C4-11 - 15,385 lbs.

T/O, MGTOW: 5,910

Ldg. Dist, MLW: 2,770

Max Ramp Wt: 91,400 lbs.

Max Fuel: 41,300 lbs. (all in the wings)

Max Payload: 6,200 lbs.

Max Payload Full Fuel: 1,800 lbs.

Cabin: 42'11" X 6'2" X 7'4"

Length: 96 ft.

Wingspan: 93'6"

Wing Area: 1,136.5 sq. ft.

Wing Loading: 80 lbs. sq. ft.

Baggage Area: 226 cu. ft.

Cabin Alt: 5,960 at 51,000 ft.

Honeywell Planeview Avionics with 14.1 in LCD Displays

DOC: $1912 hr.


Global Express XRS*

LRC: M 0.82 - 6,500 nm.

Norm. Cruise: M 0.85 - 6,150nm.

High Speed Cruise: m 0.87 - 5,450 nm

Thrust: BR 710A - 14,750 lbs.

T/O, MGTOW: 6,190 ft.

Ldg. MLW: 2,670 ft.

Max Ramp Wt: 98,250

Max Fuel: 44,975 lbs.

Max Payload: 4,500 lbs.

Max Payload full fuel: 1,775 lbs.

Cabin: 44'3" X 6'3" X 8'2"

Length: 99.42 ft.

Wingspan: 94 ft.

Wing Area: 1022 sq. ft.

Wing Loading: 96.135 lbs sq. ft.

Baggage Area: 200 cu. ft.

Cabin Alt: 4,500 ft. at 45,000 ft.

Honeywell Primus 2000xp avionics with 8" displays

DOC: $2032 hr.

* Manufacturer's data, aircraft not yet certified.


Global Express **

LRC: M 0.80 - 6,135 nm.

Norm. Cruise: M 0.85 - 5,870 nm.

Thrust: BR 710A - 14,750 lbs.

T/O, MGTOW: 5,970 ft.

LDG, MLW: 2,700 ft.

Max Ramp Wt: 96,250 lbs.

Max Payload: 4,800 lbs.

Max Payload Full Fuel: 1,700 lbs.

Wing Loading: 94.18 lbs sq. ft.

Baggage Area 185 cu. ft.

Cabin Alt: 8,000 ft at 51,000 ft.

All other external and internal dimensions same as Global Express XRS.

DOC: $ 2,032 hr.

** Data from Conklin & DeDecker, Fall 2004.

GV







~
 
Last edited:
400a - just curious - since when do you have to have the fms programmed to shoot an ILS to mins?

AA717DRIVER - get off the EEOC THING - it probably has benefitted you more than anyone else - if i was you, i would be concerned if AA is going to take any more of your money and benefits.....
 
Fms

jetjockey1231 said:
400a - just curious - since when do you have to have the fms programmed to shoot an ILS to mins?

Might be nice to have the missed app. and holding in the FMS, you might not land when you get to mins. Just a few key strokes to sel. the app. and it is all there.
 
read it again Jet Jock

jetjockey1231 said:
400a - just curious - since when do you have to have the fms programmed to shoot an ILS to mins?

AA717DRIVER - get off the EEOC THING - it probably has benefitted you more than anyone else - if i was you, i would be concerned if AA is going to take any more of your money and benefits.....

Like Mobie said, Why would you not.

As I said in the post, You do not "HAVE" to, but why would you not. Like I said, Lets turn the TCAS and EGPWS off too.
 
Bottom line : If you are flying in the right seat of a G4, the chief pilot was more worried about saving money then having a profesional flight crew in the cockpit.....bottom line.

I know my boss and ceo would never put is family on board with a low time guy.

SCT
 
jetjockey1231 said:
400a - just curious - since when do you have to have the fms programmed to shoot an ILS to mins?

It's about situational awareness. It's about safety. It's about using all means available on the flightdeck to aid your job.

Most if not all advanced cockpits using EFIS present a picture of your course. Programming the FMS for an ILS or any other type of approach puts the picture right in front of you. On the 2000 EASy (and many others I'm sure) having the approach programmed, along with the miss and hold, when I hit mins and have to miss, I hit the TOGA, the FMS automatically sequences to the missed approach procedure, I arm and fly LNAV by hand or by autopilot. There is no worries about tracking headings, intercepting radials, etc. Of course, I have those as back up, but my FMS gives me everything including published altitudes and will give me guidance in entering and flying the hold. I still know how to do all this manually but why not use any and every means available to make my job (and life) easier, not to mention safer.

I'm all in favor of giving young pilots a break. I'm also an advocate of paying ones dues. That is to say, getting experience, not washing the boss' car! At 700 hours, regardless of make and model flown, how much has been actual IFR? How many approaches has one made (actual, not hood)? How many actual missed approaches? My guess is not very many. Chances are, if someone did hire you at that low time (other than CFI), most of your flying has been heading out on a sunny afternoon for the $100 hamburger with your buddies.

Another thing to consider that has been overlooked (unless I missed it in the threads), lets say you landed your dream job, right seat in a G4 or Falcon 900 or a Lear 60 at 700-800 hours total time. You get through the SIC initial. You're now in the right seat with not much more than sim time. How confident are you if your veteran captain keels over on the yoke? How confident are you if your vetern captain suddenly becomes ill due to the bad fish he had for lunch and has to spend time in the lav? Ok, chances are remote this would ever happen, but, what if? Is this a reasonable question a Chief Pilot and CEO must ask themselves? You bet it is.

If a CP wants to hire a 700 hour pilot, great...more power to them. But they are also going to have to deal with their seasoned pilot's grumpiness when they not only have to concern themselves with their normal duties, but also watching over your every move until you've gained some experience. Many departments put higher approach minimums on new pilot's as a safety buffer. Thats pilot's with three times your experience. What are they supposed to do with a 700 hour pilot, up them to 1000 & 1? Good grief, a winter in the midwest and you might never get to shoot the approach!

As I said before, we've all been there (low time). I know when push comes to shove, my CEO wants a pilot who can handle the worst case scenario, be it as a crew of single pilot.

Regards,

2000Flyer
 
mobie said:
jetjockey1231 said:
400a - just curious - since when do you have to have the fms programmed to shoot an ILS to mins?

Might be nice to have the missed app. and holding in the FMS, you might not land when you get to mins. Just a few key strokes to sel. the app. and it is all there.

include me in the question...

Do you usually shoot approaches w/o putting them in the FMS????

:confused: ..
 
jetjockey1231 said:
400a - just curious - since when do you have to have the fms programmed to shoot an ILS to mins?

Why would you not? It's a few keystrokes. In most airplanes, it sequences in the missed approach if you hit the GA button. If you can't handle the airplane and plug in the approach in the FMS, you shouldn't be flying the airplane. IMO, if you can't do everything by yourself in the airplane(everything you can physically reach), you shouldn't be in it. If the other pilot is incapacitated, you're on your own...you better be able to handle it. Do you honestly believe a 700 hour pilot in a GIV could do so when the sh!t hits the fan?
 
Yes I do. There are tons of 200 hour 'wonder' pilots in europe flying 737/A320' around the place..
 
Flyingdutchman said:
Yes I do. There are tons of 200 hour 'wonder' pilots in europe flying 737/A320' around the place..

However...

These pilot's, from day one, are screened and tested BEFORE they start flight training. Once in training, it's all done as a "crew" where heavy emphasis is put on CRM. Early in their training, it's regimented and typically airline specific.

To suggest they run out to mom and pop's flight school for a commercial and dart off to the airline is a total and complete misrepresentation.

They may also have strong limitations placed on them during their early careers. Some have requirements that don't allow the FO to fly the aircraft until reaching a certain minimum hour level in that type of aircraft.

An example I personally know of with an Asian carrier. They had sent a 4000 hour pilot to a reputable Texas simulator training company ;) for a Citation type rating. This individual had over 3500 hours SIC experience on a B744. This amiable fellow was a risk to himself and everyone else when his hands were on the controls. His situational awareness and ability to fly in IMC conditions were so bad he'd never pass an FAA instrument ride. Why, you are wondering? Their company procedures were so that the FO (hired with around 300TT) was never allowed to fly the plane. Their procedures and culture dictated that the CA was the only manipulator of the controls. He had met the prerequisite to upgrade to CA, thus the training for a type rating in Texas. Once that was completed the soon-to-be upgraded pilot would go through several months of a training program at his airline.

Foreign carriers have stark difference from what we're used to seeing the the U.S. To try and compare the two is akin to comparing a Ford Probe to a BMW Z3.

2000Flyer
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom