Anyone have any leads on NTSB's O&Os, FAA Cases, and the like for how the FAA treats a CFI that just won't get a clue?
He just allowed a student to run a tank dry claiming that the student needed the lesson. The engine stopped, of course, but that was at 30 feet after takeoff. His statements on frequency don't support his 'allowing' the student anything, he was completely surprised.
This guy has had multiple encounters with the FAA in the past and just keeps coming back. It's never his fault, he never could have prevented the problem, the student was PIC, the FAA was just being mean to him, blah blah blah.
Yeah, I could just walk away. I know what it's like to have the FAA after you. But this guy defies description. If the engine had quit 30 seconds later, I probably would have watched a fatal accident. They didn't put the nose down until almost too late.
???!!!
He just allowed a student to run a tank dry claiming that the student needed the lesson. The engine stopped, of course, but that was at 30 feet after takeoff. His statements on frequency don't support his 'allowing' the student anything, he was completely surprised.
This guy has had multiple encounters with the FAA in the past and just keeps coming back. It's never his fault, he never could have prevented the problem, the student was PIC, the FAA was just being mean to him, blah blah blah.
Yeah, I could just walk away. I know what it's like to have the FAA after you. But this guy defies description. If the engine had quit 30 seconds later, I probably would have watched a fatal accident. They didn't put the nose down until almost too late.
???!!!