Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Cessan 172 - G1000 equipped

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

navigator72

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
913
I just flew in a Brand new Cessna 172 fully equipped with the G1000 avionics package and I have to say it is pretty sweet. Much different than the old puddle jumpers I am used to.
 
You really think AOPA is useless?
 
navigator72 said:
I just flew in a Brand new Cessna 172 fully equipped with the G1000 avionics package and I have to say it is pretty sweet. Much different than the old puddle jumpers I am used to.

Yes, I see that Boeing is finally putting something that looks comparible, into their latest jetliner! :)
 
That thing has nicer computers than the CRJ (and a lot of other jets that I haven't flown). If you can master the G1000, the transition to a "glass" paneled jet will be no sweat.
 
One aspect of the g1000 that is inexplicable, and potentially really bad, is that on the main display, the glideslope and localizer needle do not seem to be on the same part of the display.

The top part of the display with the artificial horizon has the glideslope, and the bottom section of the display with the "HSI" has the localizer on it. Why they didnt put both on the same display, like every other efis, and like every hsi out there, well I do not know
 
I've flown a glass 172.

It's pretty nice until you take off, and then you realize you're still flying a f'ing 172. :D
 
Metro752 said:
In the case of Meigs Field, very useless.

Justify what you are saying...what more could they have done...blown up the dozers on the midnight raid?

They got more email from their members about meigs than the temp shutdown of flying after 9 11...

Honestly, back it up.
 
They could have actually kept the airport in existance if they didn't feel it was a waste of time. They didn't try hard enough, they didn't care. They got Bulldozed by Mayor Daley, who was comitting an illegal act.

If they can't protect Meigs Field, they cannot protect anything.
 
Metro752 said:
They could have actually kept the airport in existance if they didn't feel it was a waste of time. They didn't try hard enough, they didn't care. They got Bulldozed by Mayor Daley, who was comitting an illegal act.

If they can't protect Meigs Field, they cannot protect anything.

I see, and what planet were you living on at the time?
 
Metro752 said:
In the case of Meigs Field, very useless.

You turd, AOPA invested a lot more resources than anyone else to fight that battle, and it still isn't over. They continue to push for civil penalties. If you want to be pissed at someone, be pissed at the courts for not issuing the Injunction. Or maybe at Daley, since he's the one who did it.
 
dude, nice timing, i just got home from riding with 2 CFI's in a brand new 172 with the G1000 cockpit. amazing. simply put, this cockpit, once you get the hang of it, is mindboggling. it was so cool!!!!
 
Metro752 said:
Yay, I'm a turd! So is Phil Boyer and his fancy jet!

Dear Turd,
I didn't realize Phil Boyer had a jet. I don't know why he would need one since the company that he heads has a corporate jet (as do many, many other companies including the one that employs me.)

Maybe you should send AOPA a resume. I'm sure you could a better job. Perhaps after seeing your ignorant rants, they'll have an opening for a new Executive Director or Chief Counsel.

Do you blame AOPA for closing MSY and NEW after Katrina?
 
The G1000 is pretty cool, but I sure don't like the fact that you can do a "partial fill up" of fuel into the fuel computer. The only option at this point is to fill the whole thing up. Pretty lame. Oh yeah, where the heck is the flight director. I'm sure it will be there on the Mustang, so it can't be that hard on the 172. Mo Bucks.........

bigDI've flown a glass 172.

It's pretty nice until you take off, and then you realize you're still flying a f'ing 172. :D
Exactly
 
pilotmiketx said:
Dear Turd,
I didn't realize Phil Boyer had a jet. I don't know why he would need one since the company that he heads has a corporate jet (as do many, many other companies including the one that employs me.)

Maybe you should send AOPA a resume. I'm sure you could a better job. Perhaps after seeing your ignorant rants, they'll have an opening for a new Executive Director or Chief Counsel.

Do you blame AOPA for closing MSY and NEW after Katrina?


Lmao you radical clown, Do I blame Boyer for closing MSY and NEW? Of course not, I blame George W. Bush!
 
Geronimo4497 said:
The G1000 is pretty cool, but I sure don't like the fact that you can do a "partial fill up" of fuel into the fuel computer. The only option at this point is to fill the whole thing up. Pretty lame. Oh yeah, where the heck is the flight director. I'm sure it will be there on the Mustang, so it can't be that hard on the 172. Mo Bucks.........

bigDI've flown a glass 172.

It's pretty nice until you take off, and then you realize you're still flying a f'ing 172. :D
Exactly

I am pretty sure the avidynes let you do a partial fill up.

Sounds like there are still some issues to be worked on for it.
 
414Flyer said:
Why they didnt put both on the same display, like every other efis, and like every hsi out there, well I do not know

That is wrong. I know a Collins ProLine IV has the G/S on the ADI and LOC CDI is on the HSI.
I'm pretty sure most are like this.
 
Thanks for the correctlon. Still seems a bit odd to seperate them.
 
Wouldnt it be neat if those screens could be put into instructor mode and the instructor could change the settings so that he could fail some instruemnts and gauges on the students and reset them.

This would be done from the instructor side and the student wouldnt know rather than reaching over and covering the instruemnts.
 
Last edited:
I'm talking about an unpredicted failure. kind of like in a sim. over temp, slow gyro failure, blocked static source, erroneous airspeed indications, etc. which the student needs to catch....
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom