CAL cancelling CHQ flying

[ToiletDuck]

Not bad. You got the state right.

Do your pax and your CA a favor and make sure you check those -9 pages a little more closely.

K? K!

Looks like someone is going well out of their way to be a dick... The question is why? Give the guy a break and by the way if you just say "K" you're queer and yes it's perfectly ok to be homophobic it's only natural.

 

[Superpilot92]

Not bad. You got the state right.

Do your pax and your CA a favor and make sure you check those -9 pages a little more closely.

K? K!

Well Considering i have never been to LGA or JFK i think i am allowed to make the mistake!! I really do appreciate you worrying about a good old Texas boy like myself. i appreciate you being the Flamer that you are, It really shows!

I agree Duck i think its only natural to think Non union is a homo! LOL

 

[BigLebowski]

CAL is not cancelling the contract with CHQ. It was a 5 year award, they're not going to go back on it. Don't kid yourself, CHQ is fully capable of providing just as good a service as XJet. Who nows, maybe CHQ will do good enough and mainline will award the rest of XJet's flying to them.

 

[Alchemy]

CHQ is fully capable of providing just as good a service as XJet.

Nah, probably not. But since when do legacy carriers care about good service nowadays? They don't.

 

[ToiletDuck]

Nah, probably not. But since when do legacy carriers care about good service nowadays? They don't.

I did recently find out they stopped giving sandwiches. I was pissed. I liked that nitrogen taste in them.

 

[Superpilot92]

CAL is not cancelling the contract with CHQ. It was a 5 year award, they're not going to go back on it. Don't kid yourself, CHQ is fully capable of providing just as good a service as XJet. Who nows, maybe CHQ will do good enough and mainline will award the rest of XJet's flying to them.

Considering this whole think went down because of diversification, i bet that doesnt happen. just a guess!!:bomb:

 

[jeroom]

Considering this whole think went down because of diversification, i bet that doesnt happen. just a guess!!:bomb:

Where is that superwoman of your avatar from???

I need to know where to find her...just to know if she's has planned anything for the next 30 years...

 

[jrcpilot]

From what I can see in ATL with those jet-Brasilias aka EMB145's there seems to be a serious load problem on a high percentage of flights, especially with summer weights. Faults it may have, however the CRJ-200 appears to be a much better aircraft all round, with reliability and maintenance as a big plus. Not to be overly critical, but the cockpit in that EMB thing is a total mess compared with the CRJ, too much stuff to look at! Even with full FMS/RNAV and ACARS capabilities fitted, the CRJ cockpit looks empty compared to the E145. What's wrong with this picture....comments anyone?

Maybe EMB scores better with their E170's and 190's.

Hats off to the 145/135 guys learning to decipher all those little boxes on their screens, and information popping up all over the dang place. Not a very user friendly design, but I guess you gotta work with what you get!

Money talks with the majors, no matter what when it comes to "connection" contracts, and we all keep sliding further into the abyss. When will they ever learn to invest in good equipment, support infrastructure, and more importantly their workforce? That is the root problem in the regional camp right now, and there is no light at the end of the tunnel.

Example, what was Delta smokin' when they awarded more aircraft to Freedom recently, even though they were CRJ's? They want a "seamless experience" for passengers between a connection carrier and mainline-not going to happen in this case, never!
Nope, it's more bottoms in seats for as little cost as possible, that's the goal.

Dude your smokin some serious crack!!! You obviously don't know alot about the CRJ200 or the ERJ145 cause your comments are so backwards its not even funny!!! The load problem with CHQ deals with their W/B program not the airplane. Which interestingly enough its the CRJ. As far as MTC you obviously don't know your won companies track record regarding that or you would not make that comment. If your with ASA you have your share of W/B problems too.

 

[ERJFO]

CAL is not cancelling the contract with CHQ. It was a 5 year award, they're not going to go back on it. Don't kid yourself, CHQ is fully capable of providing just as good a service as XJet. Who nows, maybe CHQ will do good enough and mainline will award the rest of XJet's flying to them.

I can't remember the last time XJet weight restricted a flight to 44 causing gate agents to buy tickets off 6 people at $500 each plus hotel and meal vouchers.

 

[The Drizzle]

I can't remember the last time XJet weight restricted a flight to 44 causing gate agents to buy tickets off 6 people at $500 each plus hotel and meal vouchers.

Yes, i'd like to kick our POI and other FSDO members directly in the groin.