FlyingToIST-
First off, I like your website
www.acuwings.com. Is this the school you operate? I bet there is a lot of great flying out in that area!
Since you are a professional pilot and interviewer, I hope that you realize that each prospective employee you interview are different and bring their own traits to the interview.
That's unfortunate that you had a few bad interviews with UND graduates. I'm sure you have had bad interviews with others as well, either from FBO's or other flight schools. As a UND alum and ex "BrainWasher" flight instructor, I assure that as with anywhere, there are very sharp, and skilled pilots and then there are those who just go through the motions and get by. It's not fair to generalize and say "I cannot believe how successfuly the school brain washed them all.. "
Flying is fun! Some fun things I did while at UND was flying XC's into MSP many times, Winnepeg (Int'l expierence), Meigs, DEN...low IFR flying, acrobatic flights and providing many fun expierences for my students to learn from.
I also smirked when I read some of the things you heard. Most graduates from UND or ERAU or Purdue etc... should know most of these things. It is sad that your few pilots are unable to think outside of the box. I assume that they are newer instructors who haven't had many teaching expierences yet. Give it time and with your help, they will form their own good traits and habits.
As mentioned before, all this "procedural" stuff is designed to prepare students for the airlines, and what do you mean "Except to show off?" Not all UND grads are heading for the airlines, but it's procedures are essencial for safety. As you know, their is a vast difference between Part 61 and 141 which I am not about to get into. I've taught both and have issued certs.
Good luck with your school and I hope you have a few better apples from UND and others that help Acu Wings to grow!
Peter-
The main reason that "A person OTHER than the instructor or pilot flying PIC making the go/no-go decision" is that the FSDO and insurance companies usually give go/no-go guidelines for fianical and safety reasons. Would you let a brand new PVT pilot go on a 250nm XC with 3sm and 1000'? Sure it's legal, but what if they were your responsibility and using your aircraft? If a company would allow this, then this would be a "Just a little scary".
"Talk about learning how to work in the real world", well in the real world, airlines and corporate and most company pilots also have others make the go/no-go decision. Dispatch and your company come up with guidelines for operations-just like flight schools and FBO's.
As always, the PIC ALWAYS has the final go/no-go decision. That's one thing you have been tested on during every checkride.
---------
UND, ERAU, Purdue and other schools all have skilled and lacking grads, just like corporate pilots, airline pilots, flight instructors, students...
It's all up to the individual.
As my FAA checkairmen who gave me my Private said, "Your license is a ticket to continue your learning."
Happy Contrails,
-Night_Flight-