Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Bombardier to sell 120 planes to NETJETS???

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
if they treat their employees properly they have nothing to worry about.

would you take a nice steaming ******************** on 1 billion dollars?

think about that.

I disagree. Look at what the unions did to the railroads and General Motors.
 
Yup, it was the UAW's fault that GM management made a business decision in the mid-90s to concentrate focus on more-profitable trucks & SUVs, relegating their cars to undesirable designs with poor drivetrain reliability. Fast forward to the mid-late 2000s when fuel prices make 15mpg in a Tahoe undesirable in a daily driver and 25mpg in a compact or sedan is uncompetitive with Hondas & Toyotas that have better design & reliability (to say nothing of efficiency). Of course, that's to say nothing of a generation of car buyers who were growing up when GM made really crappy cars and their parents switched to Toyotas & Hondas for reliability, and won't ever consider owning a domestic vehicle.

Yeah, the laborers really screwed the pooch on that one.
 
I disagree. Look at what the unions did to the railroads and General Motors.

As a former union pilot and current union railroad employee I would like to hear further about this.

Care to elaborate?



Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
 
When/if you find yourself up against a union buster in a few years who was beat up on the playground and had a pilot for a step father, you'll be glad you have a union.

What management does, doesn't always make business sense . Remember 2005!
 
Look at what non-union investment bankers and mortgage brokers did to the economy.

I can play this game too. :D

We have a friend in the mortgage banking business, and she has told us how Federal Banking regulators threatened them with JAIL TIME if they didn't write more low-income mortgages. The collapse of the economy was caused by the Federal government's increasingly aggressive implementation of the Community Reinvestment Act, which was first passed in 1977, I believe. The financial community's securitizing of mortgages was a rational response to a required government action, namely the writing of millions of bad mortgages in order to provide home ownership to people who had no business owning a home. The financial types assumed, not unreasonably, that since the government had required these mortgages to be approved, the government must be ultimately backing the mortgages. The collapse, starting with Lehman Brothers and escalating beyond, was caused by well intentioned government actions, not the market place. Is this fun or what??
 
We have a friend in the mortgage banking business, and she has told us how Federal Banking regulators threatened them with JAIL TIME if they didn't write more low-income mortgages. The collapse of the economy was caused by the Federal government's increasingly aggressive implementation of the Community Reinvestment Act, which was first passed in 1977, I believe. The financial community's securitizing of mortgages was a rational response to a required government action, namely the writing of millions of bad mortgages in order to provide home ownership to people who had no business owning a home. The financial types assumed, not unreasonably, that since the government had required these mortgages to be approved, the government must be ultimately backing the mortgages. The collapse, starting with Lehman Brothers and escalating beyond, was caused by well intentioned government actions, not the market place. Is this fun or what??

Were those government policy makers unionized?
So I guess it wasn't the unions fault. :rolleyes:
 
Look at what non-union investment bankers and mortgage brokers did to the economy.

I can play this game too. :D

Nothing personal...just picking up on the comment.

NetJet wouldn't have even been born if it wasn't for Wall Street and most of the bubble in aviation during 2004-2008 came from the housing industry geniuses. The demand for pilots came from these "low life's".

It is funny that a couple of the posters are ragging on capitalist and their kind, but how many pilots buy a/c or time on fracs that give pilots the opportunity for employment? The answer is none so every time you see a passenger that is paying your salary and the rest of the freight, you should count your blessings that they never thought the way you do. They didn't accept the status quo or want any part of a union, they wanted the ability to use their brains, compete, succeed, and enjoy the fruits of their labor.

Get off your butt and notion of entitlement and get a different job if you want to succeed because no union, or anybody else, is going to get you more than what they can buy from somebody else for less.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top