angryoneincher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Posts
- 83
RollandPull said:Hey Puke, Apparently your negative attitude and eagerness to spread rumors and the half truths of like minded malcontents has had an opposite affect on the good people you have attempted to influence. Apparently there are others who have been interviewed and were hired that do not share in your pessimistic, doom and gloom, the sky is falling outlook.
I noticed you didn’t bother to share these opposing viewpoints with the rest of us. Was that because these other opinions did not support your agenda?
Since I knew you wouldn’t, I have gone ahead and copy/pasted the summaries of two new hires. Clearly there is a difference of opinion.
- Interview experience:
At the risk of turning this great resource into just another FORUM, I felt I had to submit my positive interview experience with Avantair. Received a phone call from E. P. at the end of March, went through phone interview portion. Why Avantair? What do you know about the company? What are you flying now? Why leave current job? Brief information about the company, then offered interview. Pay your own way, so I researched various forums, got some PMs back with positive information, and decided to spend the $$ to travel to TPA. Met at the airport by their company driver, one other interviewee with me. First, paperwork, followed by info session with DO, C. M. Very forthcoming with info, didn't confirm or ridicule rumors heard, but was straightforward with his information available. Big things happening soon, and ramping up hiring to keep up. HR questions: Why Avantair? Customer service questions: remember that this is NOT 135, the pax are the owners! Do everything you can to please them, with safety being the ruling factor, but don't forget that in 91K, owners do hAve some operational control. Kids writing on the wall with crayons?! (Don't treat them like you'd treat your own at that point) Overfueled? (Owner arrived with extra pax for long leg, and you can't de-fuel this aircraft) Tech questions: Aspen approach, holding speeds, holding entry, do we need an alternate etc. Job offered at interview, flight $$ reimbursed if hired (they really want to weed out the "job fisherman") Looks like a good schedule, pay is very competitive, upgrade fast (everyone hired seems to have PIC minimums), hence the mins requirements, and they all seem to enjoy the airplane. Both E and C are very net savvy, and they don't like backstabbing from within on forums and chat rooms. Freedom of speech is great, but don't bite the hand that feeds you. If there's a problem, take it up with someone who can do something about it, don't just complain like a regional pilot! All in all, I'm looking fwd to it, looks like a place to go and stay. PS (E, if I gave away too many questions here, sorry, just tryin to help get some more quality pilots on-line!)Now Pukeuke:, I don’t know and I really don’t care what the motivation or grudge is that has caused you to want to try and drag down a company that is so obviously putting a lot of effort into working together as a team to solve issues. Your approach of attacking, pointing fingers and blaming one another shows your obvious lack of maturity and educational level as well as an unwillingness to work at making a change. It is an obvious Monday night, arm chair quarterback technique developed by a self centered, lazy natured cling-on.
- Interview experience:
I flew in for an afternoon interview after being called by E. to confirm some of the information on my resume. I was picked up by the driver from the airport and dropped off. When I arrived at the office C. the DO and E. his Assistant had me fill out an application. The facilities were not much but it was explained that they had just moved and most of the furniture had not arrived yet. When I was finished C. and E. went over the power point presentation about the company. During this time we were asked about what we knew about the company and the aircraft they operate. When that was finished we were able to ask any questions. During this time I asked some very pointed questions and feel that C. was able to answer all the questions honestly. He strongly emphasized that he wanted you to think about the choice you were making and if you had any doubts to think about it long and hard before making the commitment. When the presentation portion of the interview was complete we went into the one on one portion of the interview. C. left the room to work on an issue that had come up during the first portion of the interview so E. conducted most of the one on one. I was asked the typical HR type of "what would you do?" questions. She also asked questions about an approach plate with a METAR to go with it. All in all the interview was a positive experience. I know that many of the people were offered a tour of the facility but I was unable due to the fact I had a flight that was leaving.
If you really believed the negativity that you preach, please by all means, either get your lazy fat @$$ in gear and find another place to work, or lend a hand and help us influence the company to continue with its current direction of changes.
All Puke did was copy and paste something someone else wrote. If he agrees with that opinion, so what? Doesnt make him any more wrong than you. In fact, your ridiculous, garish message makes you the tool, and suggests that you're trying too hard. Based on past events, I would venture to say that Puke probably has valid issues.