Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Attention ************************* haters

  • Thread starter Thread starter MCDU
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 12

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Dizel8 said:
To: All Flight Crewmembers
Re: Radio Etiquette

It has come to my attention that we may have some pilots intentionally blocking the radio transmitions of ***** Airlines and in some cases making off-colored comments to ***** crewmembers over the radio.
ORD and STL ATC personnel have filed a formal complaint against Trans States Airlines with the Federal Aviation Administration, Dept of Homeland Security, Dept of Transportation, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Federal Comunnications Commission.
The Complaint alleges that TSA pilots are jeopardizing the safety of ***** aircraft, it's crew and passengers. Laws enacted after the tragic events of 9/11 makes it a federal crime to interfere with a crewmember....
...Mike White-Director of Operations
Anybody ever hear of the USA PATRIOT ACT?

Keying the mike to disrupt communications, is the same as shining a laser at airplanes. Hear me now and believe me later when they catch one of you guys. And here's the kicker, crime rates have dropped so much over the last 12 years that prosecutors are just begging to nail people with some of these new expanded police power laws in order to justify their jobs and their new tools.

http://www.dailyrecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051005/UPDATES01/510050356

10/5/05 - Posted from the Daily Record newsroom
Trial date set for Parsippany man accused of shining a laser at aircraft
David W. Banach, the Parsippany man charged under the federal Patriot Act for allegedly shining a hand-held laser at two aircrafts last winter, is scheduled to go on trial Nov. 28 in Newark.

Jury selection in the nationally-publicized case is expected to start Nov. 21, the deputy clerk for U.S. District Judge John Lifland said on Wednesday.

Banach, 38, faces up to 20 years in prison on one count under Section 1993 of the Patriot Act, which prohibits "terrorist attacks and other acts of violence against mass transportation systems"-- though prosecutors concede he is not a terrorist.
He also faces up to 10 years in prison on two counts of making false statements to law enforcement officers after federal, state and local authorities stormed his home on New Year's Eve and interrogated him.

Banach, who was indicted in March, has pleaded innocent to all charges.

"We're looking forward to presenting his defense," Ashley Witney, assistant to Banach's attorney, Gina Mendola Longarzo, said on Wednesday afternoon.

A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Christopher Christie did not immediately return a phone call.

Lifland, in a ruling Sept. 15, denied Longarzo's motion to throw out the main charge. The judge said that while the Patriot Act was adopted in response to the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, nothing in its language or legislative history in Congress appeared to prohibit its use against non-terrorist defendants.

Lawrence S. Lustberg of Chatham, who filed a defense brief on behalf of the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey, argued in court three weeks ago that Banach was at worst guilty of a "prank" that should have been addressed under state laws against criminal mischief.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Gramiccioni countered that only the law's language, not what prompted it, was relevant. He noted that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, was adopted in response to organized crime but later was used to prosecute a wide range of criminal defendants.

Authorities claim that Banach pointed a green, hand-held laser into a charter aircraft that was en route to Teterboro Airport on Dec. 29, temporarily blinding both pilots.

Two days later, one of the pilots returned to the same skies in a Port Authority helicopter with law enforcement officers to try to locate the laser's source.

While circling overhead, the helicopter was struck with a similar laser beam, authorities said. A crew member shined a spotlight on Banach's house and authorities stormed the home.

Longarzo has said that Banach and one of his daughters were directing the laser pointer into the sky that night, and they didn't realize that it posed any hazard to aircraft.

Prior to his arrest, Banach lived a very quiet life, friends and family said at a $100-a-plate fundraiser for his legal defense in July. He was content to go fishing on weekends, help out with his daughters' Girl Scout activities and collect various gadgets.

Everything changed, they said, with his arrest and the national news it generated. Banach, a fiber optic cable installer, said he had been unable to find work.
 
What a wonderful industry....Where the hell did our industry go wrong? Where did we go from Ernest Gann and "Fate is the Hunter" to this?
 
Well, we may all be childish and immature, but at least half of us aren't dying like in those wistful days of "Fate is the Hunter".
 
Intentionally blocking transmissions, for what ever the reason, is completly wrong.

How are you guys going to feel when one of your buddies gets killed in a mid air or runway collision because of it?

Just stupid, plain stupid for someone to do something like that. I have no dog in the G-J fight, other than the normal Pro Pilot concerns about the furure of the career. However there is a limit to my sympathy when the actions of you "Crusaders" starts to affect the safety of the aircraft flying around you.
 
meatwallet said:
So does one of the moderators work for G O J E T S ? Why else is it censored?
Probably for the same reason that copraphasic dog Bonno can't say [radio edit] on television again.
 
Why am I not surprised that the former Eagle planes have been brought up again. Those ten airplanes had to be removed from the Eagle fleet due to scope restrictions with the APA. In order for Eagle to take delivery of NEW aircraft they first had to remove current aircraft. They were offered to Trans States who then placed them into service at American Connection. What if they had been painted in US airways Express colors and the USAEX a/c painted in American Connection livery would that have made a difference. This has nothing to do with *************************S. The current APA scope clause prevents Trans States from flying 70 seaters for ANY code share not just American. This is what we were told by management, "you can not fly the 70 seaters for anybody." Then they came back and said "well, actually, you can fly them if you agree to a 4 year contract extention with 1.5% cola." Wait I thought you said we could not fly those a/c. This pilot group said no, that is too much to give for that flying, now we wait for the next offer. I have no problem with scope, what I do have a problem with is the APA telling pilots at Trans States what a/c they can not fly for OTHER code shares. They gave TSA management their excuse for creating the alter ego in the first place. The pilots at TSA do not have a problem with the requirement that 5 entry level positions must be offered to current United pilots who have up to this point refused to apply at *************************S and are standing next to us with fight against the alter ego carrier. If you want to really get technical the former Eagle planes are now flying former TWA routes and lets not forget who is making the payments on those a/c, Trans States, not Eagle.
 
Hmm, those 10 Eagle planes you mention are being flown by TSA pilots on former TWA (now AA) feeder routes. But yet in our contract it said that Eagle would do all the feeder flying for AA. Interesting how our "agreement" wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. How can you honestly think things are going to be any different for you at TSA?

Get over it. Move on. Be glad you are getting to fly at all. Your fellow pilots aren't you enemy... budget-conscious management is.
 
Last edited:
Yank McCobb said:
Regional pilot chest thumpers that think they are making a difference. All they are making is jackasses out of themselves.

Go get 'em.

While you're at it, REALLY make a difference. Deny a few jumpseats. Call 'em "scabs". Act like you are all that and then some. Pretend not to notice while people are laughing at you.

Mid 80's CAL pilot are ya?
 
if u go into ord or some other busy airport, people step on each other all the time and the memo said that they can be jailed or worse. yea i know people are doin it to the gateway fokkers and it's not just the TSA guys.
 
aviatornick said:
if u go into ord or some other busy airport, people step on each other all the time and the memo said that they can be jailed or worse. yea i know people are doin it to the gateway fokkers and it's not just the TSA guys.
Wouldn't it be a shame that expansion of federal police powers would net some poor schmuck on a "patriot act" charge?
 
medic&cfi said:
They know that GJ is a run-around the TSA CBA. There is no way you can justify that to at least 90% of the unionized pilot group in this country.

Its perfectly legal though! No company policies are being violated! The company handbook doesnt say anything against starting alter e-gos. The Go-jets guys are company loyal pilots in my eyes. If anybody so much as makes a unahppy face to one of those pilots they will be fired immmediately for breaking company intimidation pilocys. Oh wait.. This isnt my company... $hit. TSA is coming for me! Are those chickens I hear???
 
medic&cfi said:
The TSA MEC stood by the EGL MEC during their arbitration and even joined the EGL pilots during informational picketing. Most TSA pilots agree that the 10 EMB that came from EGL should go back.


Right, the TSA pilots were acutely aware of the lost flying for Eagle pilots that "American Corruption" represented. :rolleyes:

At the height of our fight against outsourcing of our flying to TSA and Chautaqua, I came out to the airport early one morning to discover that the last inbound TSA crew the previous night had clipped promotional American Connection buttons saying 'RelAAx' to the Saab's chart holders (one of our rampers saw them). Evidently these pilots were trying to make the point that their company flying our passengers around was no big deal, and we shouldn't worry about it. I came close to waiting for them with the Police when they arrived from the hotel, and inviting them to stay the f*ck off our airplanes.

TSA pilots looking for sympathy over the G*jet situation should include a little self-reflection. Taking another pilot's job- under any situation- always has future consequences, and the 'just following orders' argument only goes so far. I wish TSA pilots the best of luck in fighting G*jets, even though they are at this minute flying American Eagle passengers around in American Eagle-owned aircraft.

I don't personally see any distinction between an American Connection aircraft and a G*jets aircraft, but I suppose your opinion is always colored by the impact to your own career. Relax indeed.
 
EagleRJ said:
Right, the TSA pilots were acutely aware of the lost flying for Eagle pilots that "American Corruption" represented. :rolleyes:

At the height of our fight against outsourcing of our flying to TSA and Chautaqua, I came out to the airport early one morning to discover that the last inbound TSA crew the previous night had clipped promotional American Connection buttons saying 'RelAAx' to the Saab's chart holders (one of our rampers saw them). Evidently these pilots were trying to make the point that their company flying our passengers around was no big deal, and we shouldn't worry about it. I came close to waiting for them with the Police when they arrived from the hotel, and inviting them to stay the f*ck off our airplanes.

TSA pilots looking for sympathy over the G*jet situation should include a little self-reflection. Taking another pilot's job- under any situation- always has future consequences, and the 'just following orders' argument only goes so far. I wish TSA pilots the best of luck in fighting G*jets, even though they are at this minute flying American Eagle passengers around in American Eagle-owned aircraft.

I don't personally see any distinction between an American Connection aircraft and a G*jets aircraft, but I suppose your opinion is always colored by the impact to your own career. Relax indeed.


You are a liar.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom