Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA Pilots Read FOM MX Reporting

  • Thread starter Thread starter scarlet
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 14

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
No you can not tell them what is wrong!

It says " Verbal reporting of discrepancies is NOT AUTHORIZED" !

Yes for eveyone else we do write it up in the AFDL.

Come on Scarlet, you know that it means that you can't ONLY tell them what's wrong on the radio, you must ALSO write it up. Of course you can give them a heads up about what you are writing up. For instance, if you are writing up a landing light, if you tell them the mechanic can bring a new bulb with him. If you don't, he has to make more than one trip, which punishes the mechanic, not the company. If I were you I would want to keep as many of the mechanics on your side as possible.
 
I heard and read the FOM 2-5.5 that we are not AUTHUORIZED to give VERBAL mx discrepancies !!

It states
1. You will write it up
2. Call MX and tell them you have a write up and your gate location.
3. You are done !!

MX is aware of this as of yesterday, so I heard !!

You have issues, son. If you wish to start a personal war with MX, go for it. Leave the rest of us out of it.

For those of you not familiar, this is directly out of our FOM:
2-5.5 Maintenance Irregularities and the AFDL states:
"The FAA requires that aircraft discrepancies be written in the Aircraft Flight Discrepancy Log (AFDL) as soon as practical. Verbal reporting of discrepancies is not authorized. The PIC shall ensure that all mechanical irregularities are entered into the AFDL."
2-5.5 Notification of Discrepancies states:
"As soon as practical, an AFDL entry must be made and OCC notified after becoming aware of a discrepancy. If ASA line maintenance is available at the location, the Captain will directly notify Line Maintenance of the discrepancy."

No you can not tell them what is wrong! It says " Verbal reporting of discrepancies is NOT AUTHORIZED" !

Informing MX on the radio what the discrepancy is isn't clasified as a "verbal discrepancy". Telling a mechanic of a discrepancy without writing it up is. If you've ever told MX of a discrepancy and not written it in the book, you're wrong. If MX has had a meeting over this, then the days of "Have you written it up?" or "Don't bother writing it up, it's too much paperwork over a bulb." are finally over.

As for myself, I'm just doing my job. If it's broke, it's written up. I'm not purposely overlooking anything. I'll call MX like I'm supposed to. If they want specifics, no problem. They'll get their log page and item number for tracking. They'll get my employee number for tracking, because I'm only doing my job, and there's nothing anyone can say otherwise.
 
Last edited:
long time gone, well said. I agree with you, they are misreading their FOM. The intent of that wording is not to prohibit you from advising MX over the radio or telephone that you have a write up and what it is. The purpose is to prevent "verbal reporting of discrepancies" meaning not making an entry in the logbook. It's pretty obvious.
 
long time gone, well said. I agree with you, they are misreading their FOM. The intent of that wording is not to prohibit you from advising MX over the radio or telephone that you have a write up and what it is. The purpose is to prevent "verbal reporting of discrepancies" meaning not making an entry in the logbook. It's pretty obvious.

I agree.

However, certain instructors from training AND standards are teaching this way. I think thats where the confusion comes in.
 
If MX ever catches up and stops deferring all things deferrable, we're going to have some sharp looking RJs out there. Brand new gasper vents, yoke clips, arm rests, placards etc.

I have never seen so many things deferred on our planes.
 
An FA told me last night that we had an ATR with 25 stickers in the cockpit. A friend of hers had a picture of it. Whether it's doctored or not is the question.

She also told me that there were only 3 out of 12 ATRs on line yesterday. Funny, the Flowboard showed 9. It's still a 25% down rate. Not bad.
 
No problem too big, no problem too small,
no problem in the book, no problem at all.....

BTW, how many fuel drips/min are legal? Oil?

Cheers!

Lilah
 
Come on Scarlet, you know that it means that you can't ONLY tell them what's wrong on the radio, you must ALSO write it up. Of course you can give them a heads up about what you are writing up. For instance, if you are writing up a landing light, if you tell them the mechanic can bring a new bulb with him. If you don't, he has to make more than one trip, which punishes the mechanic, not the company. If I were you I would want to keep as many of the mechanics on your side as possible.

Who cares if the mechanic is "on your side" or not? What's he going to do -- not fix your airplane? Sabotage something? Take longer to get it fixed. Oh, boy that'll show me.

I'll do my job, he'll do his -- if he doesn't like it that's his problem. I'm not paid to be his friend, I'm paid to fly a safe airplane.
 
This is by far one of the dumbest discussions I've ever seen here. The Chuck Norris vs. The Duke thread requires more brain cells.
 
Who cares if the mechanic is "on your side" or not? What's he going to do -- not fix your airplane? Sabotage something? Take longer to get it fixed. Oh, boy that'll show me.

I'll do my job, he'll do his -- if he doesn't like it that's his problem. I'm not paid to be his friend, I'm paid to fly a safe airplane.


I care. Don't get me wrong, my aircraft flies with no overlooked MX, but I see no sense in making things more difficult for the mechanics when they show up to the airplane. That's why I call my discrepancies in, that's why I make sure to always offer them free reign of the galley, and that's why I make an effort to know all of our line mechanics on a first name basis.

When the time comes for the mechanics to fight to better their lives, you won't hear me complaining about my flights leaving late because MX is taking too long to show up.

I have had more than one mechanic tell me something along the lines of, "I just hate that management is putting any of us in this position." Right now, the line maintenance people and the pilots still have a pretty good relationship. I see no reason to destroy that simply by failing to realize that the line mechanics have been working very hard lately with a minimum of complaining. In other words, of course write up all your maintenance discrepancies, but there's no reason to be a dick about it.

Now... Maintenance Control, on the other hand...
 
I care. Don't get me wrong, my aircraft flies with no overlooked MX, but I see no sense in making things more difficult for the mechanics when they show up to the airplane. That's why I call my discrepancies in, that's why I make sure to always offer them free reign of the galley, and that's why I make an effort to know all of our line mechanics on a first name basis.

When the time comes for the mechanics to fight to better their lives, you won't hear me complaining about my flights leaving late because MX is taking too long to show up.

I have had more than one mechanic tell me something along the lines of, "I just hate that management is putting any of us in this position." Right now, the line maintenance people and the pilots still have a pretty good relationship. I see no reason to destroy that simply by failing to realize that the line mechanics have been working very hard lately with a minimum of complaining. In other words, of course write up all your maintenance discrepancies, but there's no reason to be a dick about it.

Now... Maintenance Control, on the other hand...

Ditto. They're mad enough to organize and we should support them.
 
Recently in BQK I saw a list on the wall in opps giving a list of ASA pilots that are prone to frequent write ups, this was a typed list on company letter head. Folks this war is abount to get a lot worse. I think those pilots listed may have a law suit if they see it.
 
Recently in BQK I saw a list on the wall in opps giving a list of ASA pilots that are prone to frequent write ups, this was a typed list on company letter head. Folks this war is abount to get a lot worse. I think those pilots listed may have a law suit if they see it.

Should have taken it down and put a copy in each named pilot's mailbox.
 
Should have taken it down and put a copy in each named pilot's mailbox.

Yeah, I definitely would've grabbed a copy of it too. For the company to site specific pilots and publish that list seems kind of dumb, but then again we are talking about ASA here.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom