Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA Performance Plus

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I don't work for his company. I'm concerned with what I make here. So, again, even if it's only a few thousand a year, it's that much more than I was making.

If you say so... Seems like Skywest bought ASA at some point... oh well. Franks and beans!!
 
Question: is the Profit sharing supposed to be taxed at the bonus rate of 40%? My gross check: $321.76 net: $203.99. Ouch. And yes, ALPA took their 1.95% too.
 
Last edited:
Mine was $907.25, but after taxes was $689.39. All that was taken out was State, Federal, Medicare and Social Security.
 
John, if you seriously want that C@NT for President...you have some SERIOUS PROBLEMS!

Now back to you local performance checking.....:nuts:
 
John, if you seriously want that C@NT for President...you have some SERIOUS PROBLEMS!

Now back to you local performance checking.....:nuts:

Well, I seriously wanted Edwards. Not an option now. Hillary is now my choice as the least worst candidate.
 
Question: is the Profit sharing supposed to be taxed at the bonus rate of 40%? My gross check: $321.76 net: $203.99. Ouch. And yes, ALPA took their 1.95% too.

.....just getting you used to what your paycheck will look like after Hillary gets in......:laugh:
 
.....just getting you used to what your paycheck will look like after Hillary gets in......:laugh:

Ha, Ha you funny guy! Too bad Ron Paul or any other Libertarians can't get taken seriously, eh? :laugh:

But seriously, why don't you quote for us where Hillary, Obama, or even Nancy Pelosi proposed a tax increase. Or retract.
 
Ha, Ha you funny guy! Too bad Ron Paul or any other Libertarians can't get taken seriously, eh? :laugh:

But seriously, why don't you quote for us where Hillary, Obama, or even Nancy Pelosi proposed a tax increase. Or retract.


Well, no, it's not good political theather to propose a tax raise. At base level, they are all politicians. No politician wants to promise a raise in taxes.

The question on taxes is who each party thinks is more capable of allocating assets. The Dems think that they, the Govt., are more capable of deciding how to dispose of assets than the individuals earning the wages that are taxed. The Republicans believe that the people who earn money in the United States are more capable of deciding how to spend their own earnings.
 



In the articles you quote, they propose letting the Bush tax cuts expire. That's not raising taxes, it's returning them to the previous, sustainable levels. Have you noticed that the republicans cut taxes as a means of political appeasement while embarking on one of our nation's costliest wars? Now the record deficit is hurting our economy globally and even devaluing the dollar. Yes, taxes need to return to that level (but not increase). No one has proposed raising the tax rate or imposing new taxes.
 
In the articles you quote, they propose letting the Bush tax cuts expire. That's not raising taxes, it's returning them to the previous, sustainable levels. Have you noticed that the republicans cut taxes as a means of political appeasement while embarking on one of our nation's costliest wars? Now the record deficit is hurting our economy globally and even devaluing the dollar. Yes, taxes need to return to that level (but not increase). No one has proposed raising the tax rate or imposing new taxes.

You have a future in politics....Would taxes be higher than they are now if you "let the Bush tax cuts expire"? If the answer is yes, then it is a tax raise....

In addition, taxes would have to be raised even more than simply rolling back the Bush tax cuts, in order to pay for all of Hillary's redistribution of wealth social programs......

Yes the Republicans spent too much money, and that is sitting well with the "Libertarian" contingent of the Republican Party......but to think the Dems will spend less......is naive at best.....
 
You have a future in politics....Would taxes be higher than they are now if you "let the Bush tax cuts expire"? If the answer is yes, then it is a tax raise....

In addition, taxes would have to be raised even more than simply rolling back the Bush tax cuts, in order to pay for all of Hillary's redistribution of wealth social programs......

Yes the Republicans spent too much money, and that is sitting well with the "Libertarian" contingent of the Republican Party......but to think the Dems will spend less......is naive at best.....

This, of course, is all your opinion, and I would expect nothing less from a pledged Libertarian and Neil Boortz disciple. Fact is, you champion Fair Tax (which I don't disagree with) and even if they left the taxes as they are, you would be complaining.
 
Clinton says "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

ahhh, socialism. It's worked so well everywhere else, why not here?

this flawed thinking combined with so many people's long dislike/distrust of the Clinton's is why she won't be elected, nor the candidate.
 
You know I remember my dollar going a lot further and one of my best firends still being alive before Bush got into office... Hmmm... Seems like the Democrats have something good going for them.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top