Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA Performance Plus

  • Thread starter Thread starter WWEfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 19

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Question: is the Profit sharing supposed to be taxed at the bonus rate of 40%? My gross check: $321.76 net: $203.99. Ouch. And yes, ALPA took their 1.95% too.

.....just getting you used to what your paycheck will look like after Hillary gets in......:laugh:
 
.....just getting you used to what your paycheck will look like after Hillary gets in......:laugh:

Ha, Ha you funny guy! Too bad Ron Paul or any other Libertarians can't get taken seriously, eh? :laugh:

But seriously, why don't you quote for us where Hillary, Obama, or even Nancy Pelosi proposed a tax increase. Or retract.
 
Ha, Ha you funny guy! Too bad Ron Paul or any other Libertarians can't get taken seriously, eh? :laugh:

But seriously, why don't you quote for us where Hillary, Obama, or even Nancy Pelosi proposed a tax increase. Or retract.


Well, no, it's not good political theather to propose a tax raise. At base level, they are all politicians. No politician wants to promise a raise in taxes.

The question on taxes is who each party thinks is more capable of allocating assets. The Dems think that they, the Govt., are more capable of deciding how to dispose of assets than the individuals earning the wages that are taxed. The Republicans believe that the people who earn money in the United States are more capable of deciding how to spend their own earnings.
 



In the articles you quote, they propose letting the Bush tax cuts expire. That's not raising taxes, it's returning them to the previous, sustainable levels. Have you noticed that the republicans cut taxes as a means of political appeasement while embarking on one of our nation's costliest wars? Now the record deficit is hurting our economy globally and even devaluing the dollar. Yes, taxes need to return to that level (but not increase). No one has proposed raising the tax rate or imposing new taxes.
 
In the articles you quote, they propose letting the Bush tax cuts expire. That's not raising taxes, it's returning them to the previous, sustainable levels. Have you noticed that the republicans cut taxes as a means of political appeasement while embarking on one of our nation's costliest wars? Now the record deficit is hurting our economy globally and even devaluing the dollar. Yes, taxes need to return to that level (but not increase). No one has proposed raising the tax rate or imposing new taxes.

You have a future in politics....Would taxes be higher than they are now if you "let the Bush tax cuts expire"? If the answer is yes, then it is a tax raise....

In addition, taxes would have to be raised even more than simply rolling back the Bush tax cuts, in order to pay for all of Hillary's redistribution of wealth social programs......

Yes the Republicans spent too much money, and that is sitting well with the "Libertarian" contingent of the Republican Party......but to think the Dems will spend less......is naive at best.....
 
You have a future in politics....Would taxes be higher than they are now if you "let the Bush tax cuts expire"? If the answer is yes, then it is a tax raise....

In addition, taxes would have to be raised even more than simply rolling back the Bush tax cuts, in order to pay for all of Hillary's redistribution of wealth social programs......

Yes the Republicans spent too much money, and that is sitting well with the "Libertarian" contingent of the Republican Party......but to think the Dems will spend less......is naive at best.....

This, of course, is all your opinion, and I would expect nothing less from a pledged Libertarian and Neil Boortz disciple. Fact is, you champion Fair Tax (which I don't disagree with) and even if they left the taxes as they are, you would be complaining.
 
Clinton says "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

ahhh, socialism. It's worked so well everywhere else, why not here?

this flawed thinking combined with so many people's long dislike/distrust of the Clinton's is why she won't be elected, nor the candidate.
 
You know I remember my dollar going a lot further and one of my best firends still being alive before Bush got into office... Hmmm... Seems like the Democrats have something good going for them.
 
Question: is the Profit sharing supposed to be taxed at the bonus rate of 40%? My gross check: $321.76 net: $203.99. Ouch. And yes, ALPA took their 1.95% too.

Sounds like you need a job down south if that is the check!! John, you and my other ASA brethern deserve much better!!

Cheers-rum
 
You know I remember my dollar going a lot further and one of my best firends still being alive before Bush got into office... Hmmm... Seems like the Democrats have something good going for them.


You better do a bit more research. The Clinton regime was the worst for this Country. She could not find her AZZ if it was pointed out to her...and Obama, don't get me started. He has almost ZERO experience in this arena of politics. He has already said that he will be committing troops to his parents native land to help the locals....more policing which we do not need and Clinton will raise taxes. Fortunately neither one has a chance in H#LL of being elected! :pimp:

Continue the b!tching....
 
Giving up on Hillary already JP.... now you want to write in Gore.....I know you like him because he invented the internet....and thus he is the man responsible for FlightInfo......Maybe General Lee will support him also......:laugh:
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom