GeekMaster
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Posts
- 276
I don't need or want status quo. If your so convinced it will bring growth then you should have no problem tying pbs to growth as a stipulation. Giving up pbs is a huge bargaining chip to just give up on the hope of growth. So your selling the company pbs for a couple hundred dollars a year, maybe only one hunred for an fo, in bonus money? We don't have the same bonus pay as skywest so stop looking at that. But upper managment bonus will for sure be bigger.
Max I don't think you're going to have to worry about that one. It's already sort of automatically built in. See, it will take them 2-3 months to write the language and another several weeks to evaluate and vote. In the meantime, October is the time frame for UAL's RFP. Skywest Inc. makes no secret they are shopping ASA very hard for that flying.
It WILL get announced, one way or the other, which way that flying went. If it comes to ASA, there's your growth. (growth is measured in total block hours not number of airframes) If it does NOT come to ASA, then every pilot will have the option to say, "it didn't work" and vote no to the PBS LOA.