Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA parking planes???

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
As posted by a SkyWest Airlines VP:

As a point of interest, July Air Traveler Consumer Report -- Lowest Number of Customer Complaints showed ASA as #1 and SkyWest as #2 for having the least complaints per 100k customers in the industry.
 
Speedtape,

In your initial list of reasons why ASA is doing well, the fact that we now have a contract did not come up.

Considering that almost every ASA pilot knows that the reason for our new found success is primarily the contract and little else, how did you end up on the other end of the spectrum?

As posted, subsequent to Hoser's post, yes, nothing would have changed until the contract was complete. That is a no brainer. No one would question the importance of the contract conclusion. The pilots would not have invested or engaged in any changes. Likewise, from a risk standpoint, I am quite sure that Inc. was not ready to invest or engage in what would have been perceived as an unknown and unstable environment as a result of the then Labor/MGMT relations. The conclusion of the contract changed these conditions.

My question to you is: Do you think that the operational performance would have improved to the level that it is today, soley based on the settlement of the contract? Then, could B.L. and his cast of characters have led this employee group and company to the operational changes and level that it is at today? Aside of the contract element, what is different in our daily operation as compared to post contract '98? The simple answer is better MGMT Leadership, a proactive plan with tweeking and followthrough, relevant measurement tools that can be viewed by all on a daily basis, better open door policy, engaging front-line workers in the development of the processes, performance bonuses for all, recognition of employee value in achieving the goals, praise, rise in morale as a result of new MGMT attitudes towards the employees, rise in morale in seeing the results, and an increased pride in our efforts and the teamwork that is working. These elements perpetuate a continuing cylce of operational improvement.

In summary, nothing was going to happen until the contract was settled. However, the settlement of the contract did not bring about the specific changes. The improvements in operational performance are being achieved by effective leadership--that which we have never seen!
 
Last edited:
I've got a question for Speedtape since he seems to be well connected and informed. Is there anything we can do to protect our jobs with our contract? In other words, is the "scope" section really that important. Also, do you think we should try and get a single list? I have mixed emotions.

Speedtape is just a line pilot and no more connected than any other line pilot. Speedtape simply attempts to engage in the process so that he can stay informed. He interacts with his reps and others on the MEC whenever he can and interacts with his fellow pilots on Pilot issues. He understands that knowledge is power and that discussion/debate of relevant issues is necessary to distill information for new understanding and to confirm or modify his position/opinions.

My humble opinion to your questions:

1. We can best protect our jobs by knowing our contract--especially the scheduling section. The contract is our "working agreement." Studying and knowing the "working agreement" is imperative to assure that it is followed properly--by the company, but also by the pilot, as we have mutual duties.

2. Is the scope section really that important? The simple answer is YES! One only has to look at the recent attempt by Skywest, Inc. to purchase ConExpress. For good or bad, apparently, the contract scope was a severe impediment to the success of the attempt to buy their company. However, scope is usually like swiss cheese, it always has holes in it. But it is better to have it, than not have it.

3. Single List? The simple answer is, it would be in the best interest of the Skywest and ASA pilots to have a single list for the longterm. However, most Skywest pilots do not want a single list for fear that they may lose seniority--the unknown. They feel that they have an advantage for growth under Inc., because they are non-union and will get the growth. Why should they share that with ASA with one list?
 
As posted by a SkyWest Airlines VP:

As a point of interest, July Air Traveler Consumer Report -- Lowest Number of Customer Complaints showed ASA as #1 and SkyWest as #2 for having the least complaints per 100k customers in the industry.

Bring on the Pizza!!!
 
Speedtape is just a line pilot and no more connected than any other line pilot. Speedtape simply attempts to engage in the process so that he can stay informed. He interacts with his reps and others on the MEC whenever he can and interacts with his fellow pilots on Pilot issues. He understands that knowledge is power and that discussion/debate of relevant issues is necessary to distill information for new understanding and to confirm or modify his position/opinions.

Does Speedtape always refer to himself in the 3rd person?
 
There has been change and improvements on all concourses. Is it perfect, yet? Let's just say it is a work in progress! However, no one can say that it's not better most of the time today, as compared with even some of the time a little over a year ago.


I live on 'D'. It is well below a 'work in progress' with regards to operational effectiveness, much less efficiency. Frankly, I'm amazed that ASA/Delta hasn't had a fatality of a paying customer because of the incompetence of gate agents and rampers on D. It is an accident waiting to happen.

There may very well be improvements elsewhere, but the current state of the ramp on D is well below where it was left when ASA was responsible for ramp ops at the very end. Granted, summers past were a disaster everywhere in the 'hood, but 'D' worked, and worked well just before mother Delta took over.


Could ASA have achieved its current success with the prior managerial team in place? I highly doubt it.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top