ASA Memphis base rumor?

[sweptback]

I want to know why it's so hard to put change bars on the sections of the manual that changed.

 

[777forever]

I want to know why it's so hard to put change bars on the sections of the manual that changed.

Look at the checklist to see what changed. Browse the expanded checklist in the OM. Then review the technical briefing. Takes less than ten minutes.

 

[sweptback]

Look at the checklist to see what changed. Browse the expanded checklist in the OM. Then review the technical briefing. Takes less than ten minutes.

What about all the other little things that change in the OM? There's that list of changes at the beginning, but it's not very helpful.

 

[SLUF4]

why don't you guys complaining about the new procedures give it a chance to work? It's obvious we have some problems here. We are way worse at RNAV deviations than our peers in ATL and it's obvious that we have some issues with flap settings. Both are serious issues and these new procedures are designed to help with that. Honestly the biggest problem is people that don't even look at the checklist and read it from memory or read the checklist and don't verify the item they are supposed to be checking. Quit being lazy and take a few minutes to read and comply with the new procedures.

 

[777forever]

What about all the other little things that change in the OM? There's that list of changes at the beginning, but it's not very helpful.

Most of that stuff seems to be pagination changes and little stuff like it. The big important changes were highlighted in the tech briefing

 

[Oakum_Boy]

Ah, well, never mind..

 

[ohplease!]

Look at the checklist to see what changed. Browse the expanded checklist in the OM. Then review the technical briefing. Takes less than ten minutes.

read the tech brief, read the expanded, studied the the checklist and "chair flew with it".....it sucks. it doesn't "flow". it puts items in places that they should not be (confusion). it will take a long time to get used to and I am afraid it is going to lead to a serious incident/accident in the interim. it appears to have been "dumbed down". it also appears to have been written by those who do not actually fly the plane on a regular and consistent basis....kinda' like going in the sim for a check ride (not really like real world daily ops...)

but hey, thats just my opinion.

 

[zawillif]

read the tech brief, read the expanded, studied the the checklist and "chair flew with it".....it sucks. it doesn't "flow". it puts items in places that they should not be (confusion).

So would it be safe to say that when using the new checklist we actually slow down, read the checklist, and look at what we're supposed to be checking before spouting off the response? Because that's what I've been doing, and I like it better than the old one because of it.

 

[zawillif]

Getting back on topic..has anyone had Scott in recurrent lately?

 

[brad767]

Quick question for you asa folks. If your a 200 guy, do you only fly the 200? Or does everyone fly everything?

 

[Oakum_Boy]

So would it be safe to say that when using the new checklist we actually slow down, read the checklist, and look at what we're supposed to be checking before spouting off the response?

Seriously? I hope this is tongue-in-cheek. Because checklists were never supposed to be used this way???? Holy moly. Houston, we have a problem.

 

[N1VIBS]

Quick question for you asa folks. If your a 200 guy, do you only fly the 200? Or does everyone fly everything?

200 people fly just the 200, 700/900 just fly 700/900

 

[777forever]

read the tech brief, read the expanded, studied the the checklist and "chair flew with it".....it sucks. it doesn't "flow". it puts items in places that they should not be (confusion). it will take a long time to get used to and I am afraid it is going to lead to a serious incident/accident in the interim. it appears to have been "dumbed down". it also appears to have been written by those who do not actually fly the plane on a regular and consistent basis....kinda' like going in the sim for a check ride (not really like real world daily ops...)

but hey, thats just my opinion.

You can not be serious!!! Which of the new procedures will cause an accident?

FO flipping the generator on and ignition off?

Setting the flaps before taxiing will cause an accident?

FO turning on the lights on the t/o check will cause an accident?

Accident because pilots find it hard to say XX.XX set/XX.XX cross checked?

Please do inform

 

[goahead]

You can not be serious!!! Which of the new procedures will cause an accident?

FO flipping the generator on and ignition off?

Setting the flaps before taxiing will cause an accident?

FO turning on the lights on the t/o check will cause an accident?

Accident because pilots find it hard to say XX.XX set/XX.XX cross checked?

Please do inform

Mayb it'll be from all the cry babies not paying attention and whining about the procedures during critical phases.

 

[777forever]

Mayb it'll be from all the cry babies not paying attention and whining about the procedures during critical phases.

That has to be it because I just can't see how someone can look at these new procedures and think it will cause an accident. That is beyond me. I mean nothing significant changed!