FL990
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Posts
- 240
Good point, Lets hope so!CF34-3B1 said:Now that DALPA has agreed to the TA, maybe Greenjeans will finally instruct ASA's negotiators to negotiate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good point, Lets hope so!CF34-3B1 said:Now that DALPA has agreed to the TA, maybe Greenjeans will finally instruct ASA's negotiators to negotiate.
FL990 said:but there's a problem...CHQ, Mesa, Eagle, Transtates...and all those other pilot groups out there that would practically pay there employer to fly there airplanesQUOTE]
Gee, if i'm not mistaken wasn't ASA one of the original PFT airlines? Kinda hipocritical don't you think?
I'm guessing you work for CHQ...could be wrong. Anyway, the reality is if we had brand scope, we wouldn't even have this discussion because CHQ wouldn't be part of the equation. My stance on all of this is different from many of the pissed of pilots at this company. Where as some of my angry co-workers would love to see the demise of ASA just out of spite, I choose a different approach. I say we use our barganing power (if we actually have any due to the fact that I highly doubt Bush is going to allow a strike) and fight for brand scope which gives us even more leverage. Fight for that, fight for the combination of ASA and Comair and maybe even Delta too. This gives us an enormous amount of leverage for future contracts. Then we can go after the big contract and they will have little choice but to give in. In other words, what I am saying is instead of trying to put ASA out of business, as an ASA pilot, go after getting CHQ and any other outside company out of our system and focus on keeping them out...not by undercutting them, but by merging the Delta system and then squeezing others out with brand scope in order to give us the leverage we need to get the contract we deserve. This is not a personal attack, its just good business on our part. SorryRhoid said:Gee, if i'm not mistaken wasn't ASA one of the original PFT airlines? Kinda hipocritical don't you think?
FL990 said:I'm guessing you work for CHQ...could be wrong. Anyway, the reality is if we had brand scope, we wouldn't even have this discussion because CHQ wouldn't be part of the equation. My stance on all of this is different from many of the pissed of pilots at this company. Where as some of my angry co-workers would love to see the demise of ASA just out of spite, I choose a different approach. I say we use our barganing power (if we actually have any due to the fact that I highly doubt Bush is going to allow a strike) and fight for brand scope which gives us even more leverage. Fight for that, fight for the combination of ASA and Comair and maybe even Delta too. This gives us an enormous amount of leverage for future contracts. Then we can go after the big contract and they will have little choice but to give in. In other words, what I am saying is instead of trying to put ASA out of business, as an ASA pilot, go after getting CHQ and any other outside company out of our system and focus on keeping them out...not by undercutting them, but by merging the Delta system and then squeezing others out with brand scope in order to give us the leverage we need to get the contract we deserve. This is not a personal attack, its just good business on our part. Sorry
I like your enthusiasm and optimistic view, but I don't think our negotiations are going to get any better anytime soon. With the blatant contract violations by the company including scheduling, the moral of our pilot group is way down. The only way the pilots can get the attention of management is through financial or publicized means, i.e. strict adherance to mx issues and departure/arrival times. I would say there has definitely been a spike in mx write-ups lately along with a drop in our on-time performance. Our performance is one thing Skip has to justify to Greenjeans, so that at least gets his attention. Hopefully, they will start paying more attention to negotiations in the near future.FL990 said:But my point in originally asking the question is this....THERE ARE TWO CHOICES HERE, in my opinion...no more, but also no less. And these two views are both valid and healthy. But sometimes we hear other opinions...opinions driven by emotion and ignorance...by the whiners. These include the desire to put ASA out of business because scheduling extended them for a 2hr trip...this kind of crap is rediculous...what does it solve to cripple the company we work for. You see, I take this attitude personally, because I have a lot invested in my career just like everone else at the this company. I am a rational thinking person, and ration tells me that puting ASA out of business accomplishes nothing but puting me out of a job again. Whether you like it or not, management is NOT the ENEMY. For every one enemy, there is another...so if they are an enemy, so are we...and we are not the enemy either. Lets face it, they aren't doing anything that we aren't doing. We want a contract that pays us the most we can get, for working the least that we can. And if it were up to them, we would pay them to fly there airplanes. It is not a personal thing, its business, and this violating the contract intentionally...It has to stop. But constant complaining solves nothing. We need to get creative and figure out a way to make it stop....LEGALLY, not by going out and cutting the tires in MTY and then writing it up.
More thoughts later...
They would have to if everyone didn't give them a choice....Imagine if ASA, Comair, and Delta made it there top priority. Essentially, it would already be a done deal...if we all threatened a work stopage, then we would be working together already...what I am saying is that we don't necessarily need there permission...if we operate as a whole, ONE UNION, ONE VOICE, They can't stop us. We need to work together as ALPA members and get rid of those companies without representation....that in the long run will GREATLY increase our quality of life. Is this fantasy land....perhaps!49W said:Good ideas, but Delta management will most likely never allow for a merger anywhere.
I agree and you have my vote.sweptback said:There are three things that are important to me in this contract, that I personally will vote no on unless they're taken care of: pay, scheduling, and trip/duty rigs. I think if you did a survey of pilots, any seniority, in the company, most if not all would agree.
Here we go again!Lolikoka said:Call me a radical, but a REAL trade union with leadership holding core convictions and willing to go to jail for those principles would authorize one-day, illegal, wildcat strikes within a brand. Today it's Delta/ASA/Comair. Tomorrow or next week it's Continental/ExpressJet. Etc, etc. Labor unions within Europe have done wildcat strikes with generally favorable results (then again, Europe isn't as anti-union, let's make everyone work for minimum wage as the US is). They create uncertainty for the company and the traveling public, and they create chaos when they happen, but the next day, everything is back to normal except the unhappy customers.
I know, we don't want to drive away the customers that keep us in business - but I'm tired of working for substandard wages and living with the threat of my job and career potential going elsewhere.
In the legal climate of this country, wildcat strikes aren't feasible - but at least I can pretend to be a part of a union with conviction.