Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA Fall 2011 Schedules/DL Hours

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Per SH 05/2011 they were also EXPECTING our staffing issues to go away in June once DTW was open, the 700 transition training was completed, and the new hires were on line... That happened, right? :rolleyes:

There is no advanced planning involved here so we'll all just have to wait until around December or January to know what's in store for us for the Fall.

I think the phrase was....It doesn't matter how we got here???? That's the new slogan
 
Originally Posted by Cpt Oveur
Those with direct control over the staffing and flight operations are not the same ones choosing the name, at least be thankful for that. Corp Comm and the consultants for the new name aren't dictating the staffing model.


Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

Stop it!!!......stop it!!!

My sides are hurting!


I know right!? That was an extremely good one Cpt Oveur, I'm ROTFLMAO!
Tell us another great joke!
 
Do you really think KM in Corp Comm is dictating our staffing model? Really?


No I DON'T think that idiot is dictating our staffing model. What does that have to do with anything?

Do YOU REALLY think KM is singly responsible for the attempted name change? REALLY??
 
No I DON'T think that idiot is dictating our staffing model. What does that have to do with anything?

Do YOU REALLY think KM is singly responsible for the attempted name change? REALLY??

There are remedial reading classes available at low cost online. Reread what I wrote. No, I don't think that, but I honestly don't think that the System Chief Pilot had tremendous input into rebranding the company.
 
Do you watch alot of Springer? You know real life isn't like the show. Life isn't about who can be the snarkiest and insult via the wittiest sound byte.

Look "CPT" You just don't get it. KM didn't come up with and push the name change and the Chief pilot doesn't determine our staffing model. They only ADVISE BH.

BH and his MGMT TEAM were responsible for both of these decisions. BH told me himself the company needed to run as lean as possible otherwise we hemorrhage money. I believe that he believes that.
 
Last edited:
Do you watch alot of Springer? You know real life isn't like the show. Life isn't about who can be the snarkiest and insult via the wittiest sound byte.

Look "CPT" You just don't get it. KM didn't come up with and push the name change and the Chief pilot doesn't determine our staffing model. They only ADVISE BH.

BH and his MGMT TEAM were responsible for both of these decisions. BH told me himself the company needed to run as lean as possible otherwise we hemorrhage money. I believe that he believes that.

Spot on. BUT....BH only knows what his minions tell him. Yes the ultimate responsibility falls on his head, but I sincerely believe his underlings are covering up huge blunders and passing blame on others. We need more reform in the GO.
 
Nobody is keeping track of two HUGE details in flight ops. It appears that the pairings are only read after they are put out to be bid upon, and it seems as though SH and CT have no clue how to pull up and see what their reserve pilots are crediting at the end of each month. I didn't go to Harvard Business or anything, but thought that would be a pretty good indicator of how lean/fat we were on pilots.
 
Spot on. BUT....BH only knows what his minions tell him. Yes the ultimate responsibility falls on his head, but I sincerely believe his underlings are covering up huge blunders and passing blame on others. We need more reform in the GO.

Whatever. I don't know why you guys make excuses for him.

Between using a failing staffing model for 3 years (hoping it'll just fix itself) and re-branding us twice with failing results because nothing was actually changed, if by now he hasn't figured out what our problem is, then he's hopeless.

Give me a break.
 
The branding problem, yes it was the brain child of corp comm, is due to the fact that they tried to build a brand from a culture rather than build the brand from what the company mission is and where it wants to go.

The other problem is the culture they tried to project doesn't exist unless you live in the cubicle farm and hang out around the water cooler.

The culture bh wants is what we want. But those in the GO are getting away with alienating the front line, to the detriment of the company as a whole.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom