Sinca,
Have you even read the thread to understand where this discussion started, or are you just content jumping in at the end and calling it "a bitching match"? I'll post the quote that started all of this:
ASA is continually taking concessions. They voted the extension down, but that is all a moot point if they can't force management's hand before the proposed and extended amendable date. The end result is no different, except that it gives some pilots the jaded sense that they held the line. You will have done no such thing until you force management to sign a new contract. I'm not bashing ASA pilots one bit for not forcing their hand. In fact I don't think its the right time to be negotiating contracts anyways, but you need to be careful when you bash Comair by saying that ASA took no concessions for growth.
You were assigned aircraft over Comair because you were so much cheaper to operate. Your pilot contract (or lack of one) is the leading reason why that happened. So call it what you will, but you did not refuse those aircraft because they were based on a contract that you were actively trying to renegotiate. Rather, you accepted the aircraft while conceding the opportunity to force management to negotiate a new contract. To rephrase that sentence, ASA gave concessions for growth. If it makes you feel better that you did not vote for the extension, fine, but in the end, there is no difference whether or not you voted for the extension or not. If you're not willing to use your capital to force a contract before the proposed extension date, there is absolutely no difference than if you had voted it in.
"Congratulations on your no-prize, didn't-win-nothin victory." (Sprite Commercial)