Hi all,
As much as I disagree with Fins on a lot of other things, I think he is on the right track here...
You are going to see at DAL a mimic of that happened at USAir in the early 1990's.
Now that DAL has outsourced flying, some MBA managament type will figure out that, from a passenger perspective, there is NO difference between one DCI carrier and another, other than the COST.
So, with money tight, more and more flying will be outsourced from "expensive" carriers to less "expensive" carriers (plus they don't require ANY capital financing). Passengers really don't care how bad the service is because its a "little" airplane, or so they think.
But you say "DAL would never do that, we make too much $$$". Ah, but at that point, you are a cash cow, only to be milked.
Take a look at USAir...in the early 90s you had ALG, HEN (Henson, aka Piedmont) and JST (Jetstream, aka PSA). Wholly owned, makes money, great service numbers, best contracts in the industry. Mesa rolled in, just a little bit at first with the 1900s (and horrible, horrible service) and when the money got a bit tight, eventually management said "why pay more"? Bingo, our friends at the US wholly owned are in their current predicament.
In 1992, Henson was THE place to work. Comair was PFT, and their biggest piece of equipment was the SAAB 340. ACA was all about the J-31 and reeling from their separation from WestAir and burdened with a mix of aircraft from the Air Willy prop buyout. CHQ was a mom and pop operation flying Metroliners out of Jamestown, NY, and you had to pay $8,500 to FSI to work there. My point is, things change...
Don't think for second that a quality operation means anything. Don't think that you can't be bled for cash while being slowly starved to death.
My advice to ASA and Comair...do the single carrier petition, and get some SCOPE, quick.
Best,
Nu