SKYWRJGUY
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2002
- Posts
- 286
1) Why would Mesa need to fire anybody when their attrition rate is up near 30% (I heard about 500 of 1700 pilots). Of course, with firing comes the cost of hiring and training, so I can see why companies are so eager to fire people: they want to spend additional money in hiring and training replacements, not to mention absorbing costs associated with termination. If all companies fired everybody, they'd be loaded with cash.
"Spoken with plenty of Airways pilots. Most of them are completely ignorant and are just trying to pin blame for their problems on someone else, even though they need to be looking in the mirror to see who it really is who caused their seniority issues"
2) A year ago these guys were probably lauded for being club members, but now they're trying to oust ALPA (or the likes), all of a sudden they're ignorant. For 20+ years they were brilliant, then they got the dumb pill. If management could just fire all them, and hire replacements (consistent w/ [1] above), the company would be rolling in the money.
So long as employees think management is out to get them, management will seem to be out to get them.
"Spoken with plenty of Airways pilots. Most of them are completely ignorant and are just trying to pin blame for their problems on someone else, even though they need to be looking in the mirror to see who it really is who caused their seniority issues"
2) A year ago these guys were probably lauded for being club members, but now they're trying to oust ALPA (or the likes), all of a sudden they're ignorant. For 20+ years they were brilliant, then they got the dumb pill. If management could just fire all them, and hire replacements (consistent w/ [1] above), the company would be rolling in the money.
So long as employees think management is out to get them, management will seem to be out to get them.