clickclickboom
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2005
- Posts
- 1,081
Stupid Response
In any jet you fly at the the max altitude for temp, weight, range, acft performance, isa + or -, winds etc..
If i am filed to 410 and can go right to 410 and cruise at .85 why would i stop at 360 and burn 400 more pph?
Flight planners at ops file the flight plans and there is no pressure put on the pilots to " struggle to any altitude" we fly at the best alt for the conditions and I have never had a call from flops in 7.5 years.
There isnt a pilot at flops that is taught to ignore limitations. Get your facts straight
.Fedmagnet said:Most do not pay any attention to that, and the ones that have questioned it are told "It's ok, keep an eye on it". The flight planners at Flops default each flight plan to the highest known altitude of each aircraft and the pilots are compelled to struggle to these altitudes so they won't get into any trouble with the fuel nazzies.
The fuel savings are very good if you shut down both engines at TOD and land.
Flops pilots are taught to ignore all those pesky LIMITATIONS in the AFM.
In any jet you fly at the the max altitude for temp, weight, range, acft performance, isa + or -, winds etc..
If i am filed to 410 and can go right to 410 and cruise at .85 why would i stop at 360 and burn 400 more pph?
Flight planners at ops file the flight plans and there is no pressure put on the pilots to " struggle to any altitude" we fly at the best alt for the conditions and I have never had a call from flops in 7.5 years.
There isnt a pilot at flops that is taught to ignore limitations. Get your facts straight