Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

"AMR Fights to Quell Bankruptcy Fears"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy C. Corn
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 5

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
J

Jimmy C. Corn

From "The Street.com..."

AMR Fights to Quell Bankruptcy Fears
Ted Reed

03/31/08

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- American Airlines, the largest U.S. carrier, holds nearly $5 billion in cash, recently posted impressive quarterly unit revenue growth and in 2007 paid down $2.3 billion in debt. Even so, Wall Street seems to think that American Airlines parent AMR is a company in trouble, with a potential bankruptcy looming.
And shares, which traded Monday around $8.50, are scraping along near a three-year low. Market capitalization is just 10 cents to the revenue dollar, says FTN Midwest Securities analyst Mike Derchin, who adds: "A lot of investors see serious liquidity issues because they are skeptical about the revenue outlook in a recession." Standard & Poor's last week downgraded AMR's outlook to negative from positive, cutting short-term ratings to B-3 from B-2.
AMR's treasurer, Beverly Goulet, addressed the bankruptcy talk two weeks ago at the JPMorgan Aviation and Transportation conference and more recently in an interview with TheStreet.com.

The Burden of Liquidity

"I can't begin to figure out what is in other peoples' heads, [but] this whole perception is way overblown," she says. "We restructured in a different way than a lot of our peers have done, and we have competitive costs in regard to every aspect of our business except for labor costs, but that's really the only significant way we differ."
At the conference, Goulet answered a question about a potential liquidity crisis. "I said it's ironic to have people asking questions today on liquidity, when not long ago a lot of those same people were questioning why we were carrying so much cash, saying our cash levels were a drag on the company," she says.
"We have a lot of liquidity," Goulet says. "We've done a lot of balance sheet repair work over the last several years -- we've tapped equity markets, for instance, and we've made progress in unencumbering some of our aircraft, and the hard work we've done has left us well positioned to deal with high fuel prices and an economy that may not be a strong as we would like."
American ended 2007 with $11 billion in net debt (total debt minus unrestricted cash), down from $19 billion at the end of 2002.
To be sure, S&P says American has adequate liquidity, despite citing total debt of about $20 billion and the possibility of a $1 billion loss this year. And Avondale Partners analyst Bob McAdoo recommends the stock, saying: "The legacy airlines are not going out of business and they are not near running out of cash, [and] history has shown that patient investors -- who buy at these [market cap]/revenue levels -- generally see double-digit returns within the year."
Meanwhile, strong first-quarter revenue per available seat mile growth between 6.9% and 7.9% indicates that American has the ability to recoup some of its fuel cost increase.
So why the bankruptcy talk?

Fuel, Labor, M&A

First, the entire airline industry has problems. The Amex Airline Index (XAL), which includes AMR as a component, hit an all-time low of 23.49 this month. The index traded as low as 25.56 Monday. In general, investors worry that fuel costs are rising while demand for seats will slow with the economy.
Second, American's labor picture is not pretty. Among legacy pilots, American's are not only the best compensated and among the few who retained their pensions, they are also, seemingly, the unhappiest. Pilot leaders have called for 50% pay increases.
FTN Midwest's Derchin says pilot rhetoric may be intense, but pilots have nowhere to go. Given relatively high pay rates, they would lose in arbitration, and "the government will never permit a company the size of American to go on strike," the analyst says.
Third, American has largely been left out of merger speculation, which has benefitted other carriers' shares. In some ways, American wins if there is no consolidation, says consultant Robert Mann. That is because the most commonly discussed mergers would create broad domestic-international system combinations that "would take corporate customers, the people you really want to carry, from American," he says.
Finally, American is perceived differently largely because only it and Continental avoided bankruptcy following the Sept. 11 attacks. Instead, American reached an 11th-hour cost-cutting deal with its unions in the spring of 2003, as shares dipped to $1.25.
On occasion, that avoidance strategy is re-examined. In a November 2007 story, The Dallas Morning News noted that both labor and management "wear the avoidance of bankruptcy as a badge of honor."
Yet today, American "has unhappy employees, heavy debt and higher labor costs than most of its major competitors [and] doesn't get a lot of credit for having avoided the plunge into Chapter 11," the newspaper said. "What should be a happy memory instead is a complex subtext in increasingly acrimonious labor negotiations."
Says Goulet, "We restructured the company the right way: We've paid our debt, funded our pension plans, funded obligation to creditors, our employees are highest paid in the industry, and our equity didn't become worthless. That's what we are paid to do."
 
I guess the $170 million orgy of cash bonuses that the execs paid themselves last year weren't sufficient to ensure success.
 
Which ones? No flame intended; I am just curious.

Rather than touch off a flamewar, I'll generalize.
Any airline with liquidity issues. If they're short cash on hand, they're going to have problems. Getting additional capital is getting tough.
Also, if they've got aircraft coming, they're looking at having liquidity issues. I haven't checked to see what GECAS and ILFC are up to lately, but if they turn off the spigot, airlines will have a much tougher time of getting leaseback deals. ILFC's a subsidiary of AIG, which has been encountering 'issues/challenges' recently.
 
Rather than touch off a flamewar, I'll generalize.
Any airline with liquidity issues. If they're short cash on hand, they're going to have problems. Getting additional capital is getting tough.
Also, if they've got aircraft coming, they're looking at having liquidity issues. I haven't checked to see what GECAS and ILFC are up to lately, but if they turn off the spigot, airlines will have a much tougher time of getting leaseback deals. ILFC's a subsidiary of AIG, which has been encountering 'issues/challenges' recently.

You mean Yonited and American. They have Liquity issues. Sure lots of cash now on hand but past debt will be coming soon and they won't be able to cover themselves.
 
You want to expand on this gross (incorrect) generalization?

He can't....When you see dumbass comments like this:

Max Powers said:
You mean Yonited and American. They have Liquity issues. Sure lots of cash now on hand but past debt will be coming soon and they won't be able to cover themselves.

It makes you realize you're dealing with stupidity at its best!

737
 
You mean Yonited and American. They have Liquity issues. Sure lots of cash now on hand but past debt will be coming soon and they won't be able to cover themselves.

No; they're in good shape. They, along with Northwest, have the ability to easily reduce operating expenses by parking older aircraft. They have a lot of cash on hand and are not drowning in debt.
Rank ordering, I think that the best positioned airlines for a downturn are:
1) Southwest (more cash on hand than debt)
2) Northwest
3) American
4) Continental
5) United
 
No; they're in good shape. They, along with Northwest, have the ability to easily reduce operating expenses by parking older aircraft. They have a lot of cash on hand and are not drowning in debt.
Rank ordering, I think that the best positioned airlines for a downturn are:
1) Southwest (more cash on hand than debt)
2) Northwest
3) American
4) Continental
5) United

Thanks for the laugh before bed!! Made a bad day somewhat comical.
 
No; they're in good shape. They, along with Northwest, have the ability to easily reduce operating expenses by parking older aircraft. They have a lot of cash on hand and are not drowning in debt.
Rank ordering, I think that the best positioned airlines for a downturn are:
1) Southwest (more cash on hand than debt)
2) Northwest
3) American
4) Continental
5) United

Andy:
Check this out:

Cash-Strapped Airlines: Who’s Next to Fall?

Ken Sweet
FOXBusiness
April 4, 2008

Aloha Airlines and ATA Airlines might just be the first of several airlines to go belly up.

All the major airlines are putting increasingly larger amounts of cash on their balance sheets in
order to weather the economic downturn. But the fear among airline analysts is that these cash
levels will last only so long, given oil sitting north of $100 a barrel. And
the current credit
crunch makes it more difficult for airlines to borrow to raise money when the cash coffers run
empty.

“We found that all the airlines would survive 2008 but cash levels would be at alarming levels for
the majority of the carriers if current trends continue through 2009,” said Ray Neidl, an airline
analyst with Calyon Securities, in a note to investors.

The problem for these airlines, from small to big carriers, is the credit crunch and liquidity
troubles that hit Wall Street investment banks like Bear Stearns (BSC) are now affecting them.
Banks are hesitant to lend to all but the strongest borrowers, and the issues facing many air
carriers make them a higher credit risk.

That means the carriers must raise fares and surcharges because they are unable to handle even a
short term increase in fuel costs, industry experts said. The average amount of cash on an airline’s
balance sheet to cover expenses has risen from a historical level of 12% to more than 30%.

“The amount of cash these airlines have on their balance is unprecedented,” said Bob Mann, an
airline industry consultant. “These airlines cannot gamble with any loss at all. If they
carry a loss on a route, they see that as money gone forever at the moment.”

How bad is it? Both Neidl and Mann said all of the airlines could file for bankruptcy if a major
event akin to the Sept. 11 terrorist attack happens again.


In an industry with such massive fixed costs like airlines, the biggest variable cost for the
industry is fuel. For every penny that the price of barrel oil gains, the whole industry loses
approximately $19 million, according to Mann and other experts.

In order to cover the massive costs of $100-plus oil, and the lack of ability for the airlines to
raise more cash, most airlines have turned to fuel and various other surcharges. The most recent
example was announced Thursday, when Northwest Airlines (NWA) said it would add $115 to $155 one way
to each international ticket.

"The airlines just cannot handle these volatile costs anymore," Mann said. "
It just gets worse
for them as oil keeps rising because it's also affecting their customers as well. They have to
decide if they want to heat their homes or go to Orlando
."

According to data provided by Neidl, the smaller airlines would be the first to reach critical
levels of cash if oil remains above $110 a barrel and the economy continues to deteriorate into 2009
- the first being Frontier Airlines (FRNT) and then Airtran (AAI).

The big legacy carriers will be able to "survive" in all of 2008 and into part of 2009, experts
said. But at some point rising fuel costs will eventually conquer the big airlines as well.

According to Neidl and Mann, the legacy carrier with the biggest cash problem is United Airlines
(UAUA), which could buckle by the end of 2008 at $105-a- barrel oil, compared with Delta (DAL) or
Northwest (NWA), which could weather an average $120 a barrel of oil.


Link

737
 
737Pylt, I read that after posting my list. Since then, I'd move Continental down the list due to 10% of their cash equivalents getting moved over to long term investments - they held some commercial paper that didn't roll over; the auction failed.
I used the same starting metric as Neidl; cash as percentage of revenues. After that, I took a look at future CapEx and ability to trim fleets (based on owned vs leased).

Nothing personal, but I didn't rank Delta in the top 5 due to their smaller percentage of cash reserves and large number of aircraft on order. I don't know where Neidl was computing his numbers, but I'm going to assume that it was based on all carriers remaining static in fleet size.
I didn't factor in fuel hedging because I've given up trying to guess future oil prices and it now seems like the airlines are passing all fuel costs on to the customer. (Looking at year over year RASM vs CASM, it looks like they've passed most of the oil increases on to the customer; likely by changing bucket sizes). It looks like Neidl's calling for oil prices to increase. It'll be tougher to pass those costs on in a softening economy.
 
The ONLY reason American would run through bankruptcy (see I didn't use that stupid BK nonsense, I just type it out), is simply to SCREW the pilots out of their pensions. Every other carrier dealt with theirs (majors), and American always touted theirs as funded, but now with tensions so high, it's an attempt to scare their pilots. I'd bet their guys are pissed enough, and unified enough (great communications, mixed with guys with balls) they will make American run to the piss ant "screw the employees" government, to make those pilots stop treating us like this "We're management dammit!"

As to CAL, and moving it down at all, I don't get that since they are making money, and still expanding??
 
Last edited:
Jonny, I had no idea why there would be BK talk about American until I dug through the DOT statistics from third quarter 2007. Link: http://www.transtats.bts.gov/Fields.asp?Table_ID=279
They had $4.54Billion cash/equivalents on hand at the end of 2007, 19.8% of annual revenue. However, most of their cash/equivalents was equivalents. That's mostly short term commercial paper. Since the beginning of the year, it has been difficult to roll over that paper and companies are getting stuck with them, holding them as long term assets. That's why I moved down Continental; they had $253 of student loan paper that didn't roll over.
Companies put their money in commercial paper, rolled over in short timespans, to get a higher yield.

Once I looked deeper at AMR's cash/equivalents, most of that is equivalents. So that is probably the big issue. United has the same problem. If these companies get stuck with the paper as long term assets instead of liquid assets, they could be having liquidity issues.

I can also see why Delta was so high on Neidl's list; most of their cash/equivalents was cash, as was Continental's and USAirways'.
I can't overemphasize how bad things are in the commercial paper market. Here's an article on ARS problems: http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/25/an-auction-rate-securities-ars-david-vs-goliath-story/
While it talks about individuals not being able to get their money, the same applies to companies.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom