Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Ameristar, the new Schedule, and Ethics

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Wiggums said:
If there is a new plan that makes sense and is fair then great, I would support that. Working an extra 3+ weeks for the same base pay is not a fair plan.

I'm sure we'll be able to come up with something that'll make us happier. It's not rocket science. We have plenty of time to think as we sit in our hotel rooms posting on flightinfo and looking at porn.
 
Hi!

If any of U want more info on USA jet, pm me.

cliff
YIP
 
How about YIP and Cliff minding your own store and slap some engines on them busted a$$ 9's
 
I hear the Teamsters have Ameristar set on their sights. Conditions like that are the reasons unions roll in. Hello, management!
 
Baby Cakes said:
I hear the Teamsters have Ameristar set on their sights. Conditions like that are the reasons unions roll in. Hello, management!

A union is not an appropriate solution to this problem. It was something I wrote in a less then rational moment.

All mentioning teamsters did was bring a bunch of Netjets guys here suggesting that we can all go work over there.
 
Wiggums said:
A union is not an appropriate solution to this problem. It was something I wrote in a less then rational moment.

All mentioning teamsters did was bring a bunch of Netjets guys here suggesting that we can all go work over there.

do not forget guys that unions apply a fee for their service despite being non-profit and I was reading an article where it was demonstrated that you need at least a group of about 500 workers or more of the same category to make it worth in order to have the Teamsters interveine for the cause of the above; it all amounts to the related expenses that an union has to afford in order to accept the task to defend whatever cause.
 
Wiggums said:
A union is not an appropriate solution to this problem. It was something I wrote in a less then rational moment.

Why is a union not appropriate? It seems to me that if a union can negotiate more than it costs, you are getting a good deal. It's a very simple cost-benefit analysis. I don't know if Ameristar would benefit from a union or not, but it seems to me that they could do better than 5-2-5-2-12-2. Even the threat of a union should get you more than that.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top