airplane wizard
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2006
- Posts
- 792
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except for missing the airport TWICE.
Weak Dicks
The guy was a good pilot. He just had an off day. Bleeds were inadvertently left off in the off position and not discovered during preflight. They only discovered the problem passing through 10,000 when the light and horn started going off.
While running checklists, they let approach slam dunk them back into DFW and then on the second try they let approach do it to them again. During the second approach they finally discovered their mistake.
Unless you’re on fire or got someone dying in the back, there really shouldn’t be a reason to come back and land right away. And don’t let approach fly your airplane.
Lesson learned the hard way.
There by the Grace of God go I.
AA767AV8TOR
FAR 25.841 (b)(6) Warning indication at the pilot or flight engineer station to indicate when the safe or preset pressure differential and cabin pressure altitude limits are exceeded. Appropriate warning markings on the cabin pressure differential indicator meet the warning requirement for pressure differential limits and an aural or visual signal (in addition to cabin altitude indicating means) meets the warning requirement for cabin pressure altitude limits if it warns the flight crew when the cabin pressure altitude exceeds 10,000 feet.
One of the problems of the certification process is each FSDO has their own interpretation of the FAR's. The airplane I fly has a nice lady saying "CABIN, CABIN..." if you you exceed 10,000 ft CA. This airplane appears to have a horn that can be confused with other system malfunctions. Dumb.
Seems like we are back at the dilemma that Boeing is in with the 737. The orginal design is almost 50 years old, and the basic airplane has not changed a whole lot!! For dinosaur airlines like SWA, they don't want Boeing to make major changes to the current airplane and they surely don't want a new typed airplane!
So for the rest of the airline industry and Boeing who long for an updated
short to medium range modern airliner we'll have to continue to wait!
I'm convinced if Boeing could produce a short to medium range version of the 787, composite, fuel efficient and capable of hauling 150-200 folks, that would be a game changer!!
Except for missing the airport TWICE.
Weak Dicks