Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The 'hardly ever done' note is interesting for it's the same rationale SkyWesters use for remaining union-free but that comes under fire for "what can be" and "what is" arguments. The original post said something along the lines of welcome to self-governance...I simply do not think that is the case; perhaps self-empowered to recommend change I'd buy. Also, I thought there were external rules--a national Constitution--that goverened actions of both MECs and members; any amount of external control limits self-governement.
Dispatch ticket never expires.
What I ment is that we don't have to take a recurrent or anything like that. Once we've passed the practical, that's the last exam we have to take.Neither does a pilot's. Whats your point?
I agree that MECs frequently have to involve airline management to invoke change, but every MEC is very independent from ALPA National. They only time ALPA National would ever involve themselves in a local matter is if you were seriously acting to the detriment of the profession (ie "we'll fly the 757 for $16/hour for captains).Local MECs cannot change anything at-will, in fact I'd be willing to bet they can change little of their own accord, without either involving national or airline management. The 'hardly ever done' note is interesting for it's the same rationale SkyWesters use for remaining union-free but that comes under fire for "what can be" and "what is" arguments. The original post said something along the lines of welcome to self-governance...I simply do not think that is the case; perhaps self-empowered to recommend change I'd buy. Also, I thought there were external rules--a national Constitution--that goverened actions of both MECs and members; any amount of external control limits self-governement. I'm just squawking over the use of the term--it's misleading if not incorrect. It is representation and quasi-governance, but from what little I know/infer, not self-governing.
Um....the self-governance construct suggests the ability to directly make change in one's environment without the need for external approval; it is entirely an internal locus of control. Representation is the ability to influence the decision-makers but cannot exact change alone; it implicitly admits external locus of control. If MECs could make change on their own, they would not need ALPA not would they have to confer with management to seek changes to whatever ails them. I think union membership is more akin to a representative democracy...have a say, but the outcome is dependent on those who you vote on, and those who you do not (checks/balances).
I'm not insulting those who aren't members. I'm insulting USCABA supporters specifically.
Yeah, the retards are leaving and the intelligent are joining.
Um....the self-governance construct suggests the ability to directly make change in one's environment without the need for external approval; it is entirely an internal locus of control. Representation is the ability to influence the decision-makers but cannot exact change alone; it implicitly admits external locus of control. If MECs could make change on their own, they would not need ALPA not would they have to confer with management to seek changes to whatever ails them. I think union membership is more akin to a representative democracy...have a say, but the outcome is dependent on those who you vote on, and those who you do not (checks/balances).
sounds like our gov't
Rez:
That's one of the dumber analogies I've read.
If you think local ALPA MECs are self-governing, you're smoking crack [sure they can vote, but what can they 'do'?].
Make a change to your contract unilaterally [either without management or national approval]
and I'd believe that unionization in general is a self-contained democracy.
If we infact voted for non-representation here at SKYW, are not our rights secured in a democratic, will-of-the-people manner?
Your's are constrained by external forces, and while our 'rights' could be violated, that has not happened to the extent of most other carriers, even with the 'you'll get what's coming to yours' doomsday everyone wishes on SkyWest.
Your argument and analogies are weak.
Incidentally, Americans don't vote on self-government but they do participate in the process; it is the Constitution that mandates a government by the people [and called for by the DoI], and I'm pretty sure none of us had a chance to vote in ratification of the USC.
Sorta like forced membership in unions that exist prior to your joining a particular airline: you can either be active or not, but you're going to fall under the jurisdiction and the results of their actions regardless.