BeCareful!
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Posts
- 809
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct. I'd been reading that USAir was "done" for at least 18 years or more. Must have been true. It was even said on the Internet!
Yup. And nobody complained that the arbitrator was senile, incompetent, biased, or corrupt before he rendered his decision.Did I miss something... Didn't USair and America west both agree to arbitration?
No, all previous agreements are still in place. The AL-SAPA plan is to use their numerical advantage to re-negotiate everything with the complany to their advantage. Unethical and anti-union, to be sure, and on very shaky legal ground. They found a lawyer in need of business to tell them what they wanted to hear. Nobody else seems to think they can do it. We'll find out when their "professional" negotiator sits down with the company.If so does changing your union after a settlement change the outcome?
Agreements between the union and the company. A seniority list can certainly be restructured. The issue at hand is whether a list can be restructured purely to the disadvantage of one distinct group. I'd say no.Now what determines the senority list?
It won't go on forever -- one way or another...The arbitration or do they start over again with west and east??? This could go on forever....
Yup. And nobody complained that the arbitrator was senile, incompetent, biased, or corrupt before he rendered his decision.
Well of course not. ALPA at least wanted to hear what the old man had to say
Reference to the Allegheny-Mohawk stuff (another thread, but whatever) we all know that DOH isn't stated, only that Mohawk pilots got DOH even though they'd been shut down for six months. Talk about pre-merge expectations....wow.
Anyway, I found this other little piece of A/M that might provide some comfort (?). Who knows (?), I'm sure Doug and Tilton have talked about how to avoid paying out anything on this, but here's to hope that I'll get 60% furlough pay through the LPP for a year or more. Going to do some major riding!
The LPPs referred to in the amendment were established by the CAB in 1972. The CAB routinely imposed LPPs in the 1950s and 60s in airline mergers and, in its 1972 Allegheny-Mohawk decision, formalized a standard set of LPPs granting specific forms of financial aid and other rights to employees affected by a CAB-approved merger. These provisions included:
- A "dismissal allowance" for employees who lost their job as a result of the merger, within three years from the effective date of the merger. This allowance was 60% of the employee's average monthly compensation for the prior twelve months in which the employee earned compensation before being deprived of employment as a result of the merger. The length of time the employee received this allowance varied based on the employee's length of service, with a maximum of five years for employees who had been employed for fifteen years or longer.
Anyway, I found this other little piece of A/M that might provide some comfort (?). Who knows (?), I'm sure Doug and Tilton have talked about how to avoid paying out anything on this, but here's to hope that I'll get 60% furlough pay through the LPP for a year or more. Going to do some major riding!
The LPPs referred to in the amendment were established by the CAB in 1972. The CAB routinely imposed LPPs in the 1950s and 60s in airline mergers and, in its 1972 Allegheny-Mohawk decision, formalized a standard set of LPPs granting specific forms of financial aid and other rights to employees affected by a CAB-approved merger. These provisions included:
- A "dismissal allowance" for employees who lost their job as a result of the merger, within three years from the effective date of the merger. This allowance was 60% of the employee's average monthly compensation for the prior twelve months in which the employee earned compensation before being deprived of employment as a result of the merger. The length of time the employee received this allowance varied based on the employee's length of service, with a maximum of five years for employees who had been employed for fifteen years or longer.
So, I know AWA AAA was a disaster. The only other merger with ALPA merger policy was Polar and Atlas.
How did that work out using ALPA merger policy? Did it work out in the end?
Marty
Merger Policy is a tool. Some groups know how to use it, and some don't.
4,000 years ago, Egyptians built enormous pyramids with simple tools. Those pyramids are still standing...testament to their effective use of tools.
The guy who owns the farm next to our's lost an arm in a tool.
Merger Policy is a tool. Some groups know how to use it, and some don't.
4,000 years ago, Egyptians built enormous pyramids with simple tools. Those pyramids are still standing...testament to their effective use of tools.
The guy who owns the farm next to our's lost an arm in a tool.