Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So then your age 60 rule does absolutely nothing to help this problem. The answer is to wait around till he's 60 to do something about it? That's ludicrous. If anything, this is an example of how having a rule based on age is ridiculous. If this is such a well-known problem flight after flight after flight, your pilot group has a lot bigger problems than an age law.LJ-ABX said:This guy was a 58 year old Captain who had spent his entire adult life as a pilot. He was well known within the F/O ranks for making those same types of mistakes flight after flight after flight.
YES! That's my point entirely. It's the meat of why a rule based on an arbitrary number is outrageous and unfair! How can you come to this conclusion and then point to a number and smile and say "don't change that age 60 thing, though!" Absolutely amazing.LJ-ABX said:Do both of you deny that we all lose cognative ability as we age and that some people lose it sooner than others?
That's just as silly (and discriminatory). You make all commercial pilots, regardless of age pass the same test.pilotyip said:that is why some sort of cognitive testing, say at starting about age 45 should be instituted to continue flying beyond that age.
FD, my brothah, the current state of the industry is irrelevant to this issue. In 20 years, the state of the industry in 2005 won't make a hill of beans. Not even germane.Freight Dog said:If ALPA's answer to the current state of the industry is to up the retirement age, we have WAY worse problems than I ever thought. .
Well, that's what YOU want, bro. If you want to retire at 60, then do so! If you want to retire at 53, by all means do so. If I want to retire at 63, who's to tell me that I can't? I'm looking more at 58 myself, but if a guy (or old bag) wants to go longer, then nobody should stop them based on a meaningless figure. Off to waikiki to look for that moron with buck-ass teeth at Threes.Freight Dog said:I voted NO!!! I want to retire at 60. I don't want to be forced to work til I slump over during a V1 cut in the sim or a real life engine failure.
Freight Dog said:I voted NO!!! I want to retire at 60. I don't want to be forced to work til I slump over during a V1 cut in the sim or a real life engine failure.
Hugh Jorgan said:FD, my brothah, the current state of the industry is irrelevant to this issue. In 20 years, the state of the industry in 2005 won't make a hill of beans. Not even germane.
Off to waikiki to look for that moron with buck-ass teeth at Threes.
b757driver said:Good for you! But, no one is being FORCED to work. It is about FREEDOM of choice. You are LUCKY if you are able to choose when you WANT to retire - many more people do not have that choice. I also suggest that the "state of the industry" has little to do with retirement age - it goes far deeper, my friend. So, why don't you retire @ 60 like you want and let others decide what they want, rather than dictate what they should do. FREEDOM OF CHOICE!!!