Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Allegheny

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

jergar999

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Posts
791
US Airways to shut down one of its subsidiaries

By MATTHEW BARAKAT
AP Business Writer


ARLINGTON, Va. -- US Airways announced plans Wednesday to shut down its Allegheny Airlines subsidiary by the end of March, either by merging operations into another subsidiary or by liquidation.

Allegheny Airlines, based in Middletown, Pa., near Harrisburg, employs 1,421 workers and flies 41 Dash-8 turboprop planes that each carry 37 passengers. It serves 38 cities, mostly in the mid-Atlantic region.

The job losses associated with the plan are uncertain. The airline said its preferred path is to merge Allegheny's operations into Piedmont Airlines, another turboprop subsidiary based in Salisbury, Md.

But the airline threatened that it may have to liquidate Allegheny's operations entirely if it cannot reach agreement with its unions on a consolidation plan. US Airways management met Wednesday with labor groups to discuss its plan; union officials could not immediately be reached for comment.

"Turboprop aircraft will still have a role in our network, but it is inefficient to have two wholly owned Dash-8 operators with duplicative overhead functions for a shrinking part of the company," said Bruce Ashby, president of US Airways Express, which oversees the subsidiaries that fly under the US Airways Express banner.

Piedmont, with 2,090 employees, also operates 41 Dash-8 turboprops. Spokesman David Castelveter said the two airlines operate in many of the same cities, including the airline's hubs in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but that their route networks have little overlap.

"Our intention would be not to significantly shrink the size of the combined operation," he said.

In the long run, though, US Airways plans to reduce its reliance on turboprop planes in favor of regional jets, which are preferred by travelers.

Arlington-based US Airways, which employs 28,000, emerged from bankruptcy last year with the help of a $1 billion federally guaranteed loan. That money was supposed to bankroll its plan to expand use of regional jets, but the airline has struggled to meet its revenue projections under increased competition from low-fare airlines and continued weakness in high-yield business travel.

US Airways shares were down 10 cents, to $5.20, during midday trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Allegheny began operations in 1946 as Reading Aviation Services and began operating commuter flights for USAir since 1973. It was purchased by USAir Group in 1986.
 
I have several friends who fly for ALG. I feel very sorry for them because of the time and effort they put forth. US Airways has no compassion for any of them. I think US Airlines will be an airline of the past like Eastern and Pam Am soon.
 
The V.P. of Express just discovered the two companies operate the same aircraft and have dual overhead?
It's no wonder why U.S. Air is in the shape it's in!

Good luck to all involved!
 
I guess it makes financial sense to combine the operations, but it sure sucks for the ALG employees. I worked there briefly...was hired in late '93, was the first one furloughed in Jan '94. I got a whopping 30 hrs in the Beech 1900. I remember seeing names on the seniority list with late '60s and early '70s dates of hire. Hopefully everyone can find a spot at PDT. Seeing the ugly turn of events at USAir, ALG, PDT, and PSA makes me happy that I turned down the recall in '96. When the chief pilot called me, I thought it over for 2 seconds before saying 'thanks, but no thanks.' Good luck everyone.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom