FN FAL
Freight Dawgs Rule
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2003
- Posts
- 8,573
Hugh Johnson said:Since Miller was decided, lower federal and state courts have addressed the meaning of the Second Amendment in more than thirty cases. In every case, the courts have decided that the Amendment guarantees a right to be armed only in connection with service in a "well regulated Militia." The courts unanimously have rejected the NRA's view that the Second Amendment is about the self-defense or sporting uses of guns. As the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit wrote, the courts "have analyzed the Second Amendment purely in terms of protecting state militias, rather than individual rights." United States v. Nelson, 859 F.2d 1318 (1988).
I'm sorry, but you can't cite what the gay guys say over at the "violence policy center" as fact.
And besides, even a child knows that the "national guard" is not the 'militia'.
I'm sure if you edited things that Sadam or Hitler said, you could take what's left and use it for grounds to nominate them for the Nobel Peace Prize.