Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska Airlines Jumpseat troubles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 328dude
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 19

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Seems like a great idea to me.

Hey aren't you in another thread saying how dumb it is to start a jumpseat war?

I'm starting to think you're just another log-in "troll" handle for Rhoid and Instructordude. No one can be as stupid or as big of a hypocrite as you portray.
 
Last edited:
But on the bright side, I think we all know the name of "Velocipede" from the other message board now.
 
Hey aren't you in another thread saying how dumb it is to start a jumpseat war?

No, it's dumb for a regional pilot group to start a jumpseat war with their mainline partner. Denying jumpseats to non-union pilots is another matter.
 
Yeah everything makes sense in your little alligator brain, PFT_128. Where would we be without all the answers coming from a PFT whore that went to a low tier regional and now advises against both, all the while drinking and gargling ALPA kool aid then joining a non-ALPA carrier.
 
ALA COUNCIL 67 MEETING NOTICE


DATE:
TIME:

PLACE:






AGENDA:
1. Old Business
2. New Business
3. X Xxxxx Resolution (pilot's name deleted)
Refreshments will be served.


John Hornibrook, Chairman
ALA Council 67

*********************


Resolution

Whereas the livelihood of Alaska Airlines pilots is threatened by the continuing downward spiral of airline industry pilot wages and benefits, and

Whereas nonunion airlines who employ pilots at significantly lower wage rates and reduced benefit packages enjoy a marked competitive advantage over Alaska Airlines, and

...



The original post posted the chairman's name out of context in an extremely unfair and inflamatory manner. The chairman's name related to the agenda and the fact that refreshments would be served! After his name...the resolution refered to in the agenda was listed...it was clear that it was put there for information and in no way conveyed his views, positive or negative about the resolution.

Rest assured that most of us recognize the slippery slope that a measure like this would setup and would not allow this measure to be passed. Is SWA to start denying jumpseats becasue Alaska pilots are bringing down 737 wages, is AA to deny jumpseats because we are part of ALPA and not part of APA, are regional pilots to deny jumpseats to major airline pilots because major airline pilots seek to limit their flying through our scope clauses. Where does this stop.

Stop worrying.

 
This was a hypothetical and was never intended to be public or serious, just spur internal conversation. Don't worry.
 
From what I understand, which is very little, Redwood pilots are not paid enough to live in base, so they commute on Alaska so they can then compete with Alaska.

If they can't get to work, they can't work, yada yada yada.

I'm a commuter, and it still makes some sense to me.
 
From what I understand, which is very little, Redwood pilots are not paid enough to live in base, so they commute on Alaska so they can then compete with Alaska.

If they can't get to work, they can't work, yada yada yada.

I'm a commuter, and it still makes some sense to me.

Actually only a few of out pilots commute on Alaska. Most of our commuters are ex USAir, Independence, and USA3000 pilots that commute out of the east coast. Technically EVERY off line jumpseater from a competing airline you take to work is "hurting" your company. Guess you shouldn't let any non company pilots commute at all. :nuts:
 
Didn't Horizon suspend jumpseats with United over their policy a few years back. I'm remembering they did and it worked in the end.
 
No, it's dumb for a regional pilot group to start a jumpseat war with their mainline partner. Denying jumpseats to non-union pilots is another matter.
wankstream, peenukle, valuejet, see a trend here?
PBR
 
From the guy who bought his job at Gulfsteam... :rolleyes:

You bring this up and usually this is about the time this d*p sh*t has had enough to say. I think he likes to see himself post because I can't imagine he has an ounce of credibility with anyone on this board!
 
You bring this up and usually this is about the time this d*p sh*t has had enough to say. I think he likes to see himself post because I can't imagine he has an ounce of credibility with anyone on this board!

I don't post a response because I've responded over and over again already. No need to beat a dead horse.
 
I don't post a response because I've responded over and over again already. No need to beat a dead horse.

No, actually that is the only dead horse on FI you don't beat!

Lot's of respectable folks have come up through the ranks at Gulfstream and Pinnacle. Talking out of both sides of your mouth, on your union soapbox, earns you zero respect, even if you're up there screaming!
 
No, it's dumb for a regional pilot group to start a jumpseat war with their mainline partner. Denying jumpseats to non-union pilots is another matter.


That is a broad bush you are using.... I know many "Union" (read previous ALPA members) that now work for non-union airlines, due to their airline going under (i.e; Aloha, ATA, and others).

You advocate kicking these guys (and gals) while they are down?

Skipper
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom