flyhard
Airtran and ATA are two very different airlines. Yes the pay is better at ATA. Some other things you have to look at is quality of life. said:
Very true. You ATA guys got a good contract. I have heard it will be one of the "peers" for comparison when we do our next contract in 2005. One thing worth mentioning is that if ATA continues to lose money, they may come back to your guys for "give backs" . . . sure hope not.
At ATA we have a twelve hour callout with 12 days off a month. If you want to do short call, two hours, 14 days off a month.
We have 12 hour LCR too, but Company hasn't chosen to use it. Our min days off for lineholders is 12, too.
I have a whole eight months seniority and bid for long call reserve. I pick up trips on my days off and usually get around 95 hours pay and 15 to 20 days at home, even commuting.
I'm not sure it's really fair to count reserve days as "days off", but sounds like it's been working well for you.
I, too, was very lucky . . . By my 8th month or so, I had commutable lines with 16-17 days off (avg 84 hours pay). I never did reserve, but the guys who were in the last class (8/2003) have been stuck on reserve until hiring begins again next month.
I have a buddy at Airtran that does the airport reserve, so you get to hang out at the airport all day.
"Ready Reserve" is usually something people request at their convenience, because they will be free after 6 hours of RR . . . . for example, on the last day of reserve, for a commuter.
Yes Airtran is doing well for the time being, but still is a realtively young airline. At ATA we have completed our bond refinancing, so financially we are in better shape than we were.
I don't think you can make a real comparison here. AirTran has made a profit every quarter except the first one (since 9/11) while growing a 20%, reducing debt and increasing cash (over $300 million right now). In ther words, we've been making money, I don't ATA has figured out how to do that in this new environment just yet.
We have been around for over thirty years and there is a reason for that. Our management is conservative on each move they make. They will not enter a market unless money can be made.
Look for us to further reduce costs now that the DC9s are all gone and the 737-700 start bringing down our CASM further due to the longer stage lengths. We will probably not be adding cities in 2004, but will be connecting the 45 we have with more directs and non-stops.
Good Luck to All.