Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

airtran rumor

  • Thread starter Thread starter -9Capt
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 8

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

-9Capt

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
1,046
Rumor has it that AirTran will be changing it's name.

I hear the boss came into a recent recurrent class and said he is considering changing the name, but gave no hints as to what it might be, anything would be an improvement in my opinion.

I remember back in '99 when he (Joe Leonard) took over he said he didn't like the name, I guess now he's ready to do something about it.
 
That is wonderful news! Not to be rude, but a lot of ATA's passengers get ATA confused with AirTran...and we at ATA have a much better safety record and better contract.

It would be good if pax finally could seperate the best from the second best.
 
Noam, that was funny. I have an idea, how about "Valuejet", or what about "Ty Air" or "Ty Webbair"? How about "Flint Express" or "Delta Nemesis." This could be fun.......Happy New Year!!!


Bye Bye--General Lee:D ;) :rolleyes:
 
Noam [B]That is wonderful news! Not to be rude said:
You have got to be kidding. What kind of punk kid would make a post like this? Any ATA pilots want to claim this jackass?

. . . . .and better contract.

Oh, really? That's pretty funny, since your contract was pretty lousy until the new one was voted in last year, and unless your company starts making money soon, you may find yourself wishing you had our contract . . . . which is up for negotiation next year.


It would be good if pax finally could seperate the best from the second best. [/i]


Funny, there was a former ATA 757 FO in my newhire class . . . seems he didn't see it the same way as you.
 
Error, Error...

You have got to be kidding. What kind of punk kid would make a post like this? Any ATA pilots want to claim this jackass?

I'm thinking this is just sport...you know, twisting your tail a bit...


unless your company starts making money soon, you may find yourself wishing you had our contract

Not to put too fine a point on it, but we ARE making money...posting a profit for 2003, so they tell me... Also, there was the public announcement of a tentative agreement on the bond issue, so we're pretty golden until '09...

Funny, there was a former ATA 757 FO in my newhire class

If he left ATA, I GUARANTEE you it wasn't voluntarily. We have a rather involved probationary program, and not everyone makes it through. My wife works with a woman whose husband "left" ATA in much the same manner as your new FO. His story isn't remotely believable either...
 
Re: Error, Error...

UpNDownGuy [B]I'm thinking this is just sport...you know said:
He had been there about 5 years, including a few years in on the L1011 before becoming typed on the 757 (as a F/O). It was voluntary.
 
Believe it or not, people leave one job for another, voluntarily, for a variety of reasons...personal, professional, family, the perception of a better career move, etc. It is presumptuous and naive to believe that anyone would leave ATA for AirTran only involuntarily.

Take me, for example. I was very happy and excited to be at AirTran. Everything about the job and the company was positive, However, an opportunity presented itself at Alaska Airlines, and for many of these reasons, mostly personal, long term and QOL issues, made it a no-brainer to take the position at Alaska.

Everyone has to do what they believe is best for themselves and their family, Not what other people think is best for them or what they believe they should do.
 
Last edited:
If I had a "silver bullet" and could drag my wife to the West coast, I'd trade ATL for ANC too, but I don't see either of those things happening anytime soon.

D'Oh!
 
Well I heard the same story, only it was the VP of Flt Ops, not Leonard who said it. But I dont think it would happen. People finaly know who we are ( in a + way), so why through that away.
 
Last edited:
The one I keep hearing is that the name change won't be voluntary. The stock is cheap, the 9's are gone and we have $400 million in cash. Supposedly accountants have been looking at the books.I hope not...
 
With our current market cap (1.1B)I doubt anyone has that much cash, not UAL or USAir or AA. Maybe Delta (1.4B) but the FTC would not go for it. NWA and CAL (1.0B) dont have the cash. Only JBL may have the horse power,I know it's J. Orenstien!
 
Last edited:
Ty Webb said:
If I had a "silver bullet" and could drag my wife to the West coast, I'd trade ATL for ANC too, but I don't see either of those things happening anytime soon.

D'Oh!

:D :D
 
!

FLB717,

First it's positive, not posative.

Second, it's the FTC not the FCC that would have any bearing on that decision.

As they say, ignorance is bliss.

I know, I know, a degree is not required to be an Airtran pilot, or was that a diploma?

Happy New Year
 
Here we go again! Why don't you goofballs quit harrassing each other over spelling errors? If you want to edit the English language go to school and teach somewhere. It is the content that matters.

Back to the rumor....if AirTran does change their name my suggestion would be KDA---Kicking Delta's Arse!
 
the remix?!

Fellas

I don't usually get involved in this stuff, but I gotta ask where some of this stuff comes from.

JB isn't in a position to buy anyone! Not saying anything negative about that company. Just because they are doing well by all apperances doesn't mean they are some money making juggernaught who can go around buying up companies. How would they finance that deal.

The really frightening thought is that mesa might try a bid for Airtran. Now I know this seems far fetched, but consider that that group has a ton of cash and limited ability to grow as they are.

I mean it could happen. It might not be good for the folks that work there but consider..........

Let the emotional ranting commence, but sometimes the most unlikely scenarios......
 
J.O. buying AAI is not going to happen. I dont think anyone will/can, well maybe Sir Branson. Thanks for the spelling tip, Full of Luv (Love), though I have not felt any, maybe I dont want to, ewwwww:( As you can tell my degree is not that of an English General, I um mean Major.
 
Hmm, both ATA and AirTran (and most of the other LCCs) are great airlines. Why would AirTran change its name?

But if they are going to change their name, how 'bout:

S.C.A.R.E. = Scabs Crashing Airplanes into the Remote Everglades

The last time they changed their name was because of "the accident", so maybe AirTran is planning another accident in the near future? Why else would you guys want to change your name?

In all seriousness, this is not a flame, AirTran is a great airline.

I know, I know, what a horrible thing to joke about, lets be politically correct, yada, yada, yada. Take a chill pill.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top