Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
You're saying Gary Kelly didn't say clearly on multiple occasions that he wanted an agreed on list w/o the pilots, as leaders of all employees, fighting for every scrap to the length of their process agreement?
He expected us as the highest paid group to show leadership.
Then there is the reality that this purchase simply becomes less profitable if groups go fighting tooth and nail in an extended arbi.
I can show you where he said all these things and they were public and often.
No, that's not what I said. You're talking about two separate things.
1. He said he WANTED a negotiated list.
2. He SIGNED a Process Agreement that said we could go to arbitration and that the resultant list would be integrated.
I'll put it in perspective: I WANT Date of Hire integration. I *SIGNED* an SIA (by my vote) that says I'm now 300 from the bottom of the SWA F/O list. What I want and the agreements I sign are two different things. One is a desire, the other is a legal commitment. Which one do you think should be followed?
As far as me "rebel rousing", rebel rousing is inciting people to do something. I'm not, and never have.
I'm simply responding to you and others saying it was unreasonable for us to have pushed for arbitration when we had a signed agreement that said we could and that list would be implemented.
If people will stop bringing it up as if we were crazy to try to follow the Process Agreement and I'll stop talking about it.
Last edited: