Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AirTran MEC at SWAPA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Pilots are a bunch of morons with no concept of unionism. SWA was a stepping stone to the majors back in the 90's. A PFT outfit. SWA is no better then Airtran. Airtran was on the same path as SWA 10 hrs ago.

From a dispatcher? Are you kidding me. Dispatchers are want-to-be Pilots that didn't make the cut, anywhere.
 
Not to worry. The AT LEC cannot "screw" this up. It will be strictly decided by the arbitrator. Seniority will definately be an issue. I would'nt worry about the benefits, they will fall into place naturally enough. It's in no one's interest to have differing pay scales or benefit packages. Especially SW management.


Pipe Dreams
 
Pipe Dreams
Which part?

1. It's going to arbitration (more than likely).
2. Seniority will likely be one of the few remaining items to decide, most of the other items will likely be agreed upon before they let an arbitrator have it.
3. There won't be separate ops or a B-scale once the SLI is decided, the companies will more than likely be combined and operated as one within a year or so.

Sounds reasonable enough, what part of that is a pipe dream?
 
Last edited:
It should not be a foregone conclusion that arbitration will happen- that's why rationality and a release of any expectations should be paramount
 
It should not be a foregone conclusion that arbitration will happen- that's why rationality and a release of any expectations should be paramount

That would be preferable, but any proposed ISL will have to pass a vote of both Pilot groups . . . . .that seems like quite a hurdle.
 
That would be preferable, but any proposed ISL will have to pass a vote of both Pilot groups . . . . .that seems like quite a hurdle.

Thats just great, but what about the SLI?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top