Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airtran goes for Midwest Airlines

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
What the heck did mnboyev say?
 
ALPA merger policy is only applicable if BOTH carriers are ALPA carriers.

Otherwise seniority integration has to be negotiated between both unions.

There's several examples of this over the last 30-40 years...

Well that might depend on the individual contract. However, any procedures in an ALPA contract that stipulate the method of determining a seniority list integration in the event of a merger is effectively a merger policy.

Generally speaking ALPA carriers have merger and integration protections in their contract, but if a pilot group decides to, for whatever reason, concede those protections, then I hardly think that that situation is a prime example of ALPA merger policy or protections.
 
Last edited:
Lear70,
FDJ2,

TWA pilots did not think it was in their best interest to abandon our protections, we were told by our ALPA representation that it was required for us to agree to it to facilitate a "fair and equitable" integration.

That really doesn't make much sense now does it. You have to concede your integration protections to facilitate a "fair and equitable" integration? What, were your protections "not fair and equitable"?

Regardless of the reason, the fact that the TWA pilots conceded their ALPA integration protections makes it hard to condemn the effectiveness of those protections when they were not contractually available at the time of the integration.
 
Part of this comes from this article on smartmoney

http://www.smartmoney.com/onedaywonder/index.cfm?story=20061213&nav=ibs&ibshatkey=atl

Pretty interesting


King says a merger makes sense for AirTran, which has deferred delivery of new aircraft and needs to expand its destination network if it's going to grow. It now flies to about 50 cities, mostly on the East Coast and in Florida.

"They've been growing fast but haven't been able to expand geographically," he says. A proposed agreement with ATA was upended at the end of 2004 when Southwest Airlines (LUV: 15.75, -0.19, -1.2%) outbid AirTran for six gates at Chicago's Midway airport, which would've boosted its network. "Southwest came in with a check and blew them away, and Southwest moving into Chicago really put a big wedge into the middle of the country [for regional and low-cost carriers]."

The takeover bid would help boost AirTran's load factor — the percentage of seats available that are actually purchased by passengers — and keep it up at profitable levels, says Morningstar analyst Marisa Thompson. In the end, that should be enough to lift the deal off the runway.
"With the premium ATA offered to Midwest shareholders, this is the kind of deal that's going to be in the can when all is said and done," she says. "I think Midwest would have serious trouble proving to its shareholders that it could create more value on a standalone basis."

The Bottom Line

Midwest shares peaked Wednesday at $11.53, well above the premium offered by AirTran. While they've ebbed a bit since, most potential upside was erased by the close of trading Wednesday, and now investors need to wait and see if the hostile takeover will proceed.

Betting on mergers is a recipe for trouble for most small investors — they're usually late to the party and have the most trouble getting out of bad bets. King says it's unlikely more suitors will come a-callin' in Milwaukee, because Midwest's appeal is pretty limited, which effectively rules out the possibility of rival bids.

"This isn't a huge deal, but it's a nice deal," he says. "It's not going to affect the competitive balance anywhere at all, but it gives AirTran room to grow. This airline Midwest has been on the fringe, and but doesn't have any key territory or key assets or market strength anywhere other than Milwaukee."
AirTran management's main challenge is to pull off the takeover and manage a smooth integration of the smaller carrier, Thompson says. Airline mergers that happen outside of bankruptcy, which allows parties to work around union agreements that might otherwise prove intractable, are tricky things, she says. Not only do labor issues need to be resolved, but seniority and pay questions arise, and frequent-flier programs can affect a merged carrier's customer base as well.
Nevertheless, Thompson's optimistic about this particular linkup based on AirTran's relative success in competing with Delta Air Lines at its Atlanta hub. "AirTran's management has managed the waters pretty well," she says.
 
Hate to break it to you, Lear, but you can expect a representational vote if this merger goes through. Still have your ALPA card? ;)
Actually... no. But I do have the copies of my 14 grievances still outstanding. Any recent updates on those?

I know, low blow... the grievance history here at AAI isn't much better from what I hear either, but you're barking up the wrong tree with ALPA here.

The anti-ALPA sentiment runs strong and deep at AAI, my bet it would be at least a 70/30 split in favor of the NPA even with the Midwest guys voting.

People are tired of ALPA.
 
Actually... no. But I do have the copies of my 14 grievances still outstanding. Any recent updates on those?

I know, low blow... the grievance history here at AAI isn't much better from what I hear either, but you're barking up the wrong tree with ALPA here.

The anti-ALPA sentiment runs strong and deep at AAI, my bet it would be at least a 70/30 split in favor of the NPA even with the Midwest guys voting.

People are tired of ALPA.

Hmm, who is NPA's attorney in your negotiations? Lets see a retired ALPA attorney. Hmm, how does NPA provide medical, negotiating, legal, security, accident investigations, etc. services to their members? Lets see they pay ALPA for all those. Hmm, how much cash does NPA have available in case that you may need to have a strike center are maybe even a strike? Lets see $0. Hmm, what is the difference in dues? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it the same? NPA was 1% but I think its now 1.95%. Why not get the milk straight from the cow? I'm interested in the direction ALPA takes after the first of the year with the new president.
 
I dunno what I'm talking about either....But.. to explain.. No ALPA I say ye !... So... you fellas never heard of Hotdish A? .... Exactly what I'm talking bout... Probably never been ice fishing either... and never hear of Ol Swill.... C'mon my ATL flyin brothers. It's OK... I'm sure there are some southern tradition and cultural points I am not familiar with...

Let me define for the sake of discourse:

Hotdish- kinda midwestern mess of noodles, tomatoe sauce, and onions

Ol Swill- Old Milwaukee Beer.. pretty cheap beer.. but tastes great !

Ice Fishing- Sitting on a frozen lake.. enjoying the quiet peace..fishin/drinking
 
Laugh and joke now, but the 2nd offering will land the hook in the final chapter of Midwest Express. I'm very curious to see how peacably the pilot groups will work out the integration of seniority. My guess is the AirTran side will take a bath, inspite of being the host company.
 
I've been up at the cabin for a few days... I could use a bath...

Ahh... seniority, it'll all work itself out. The lawyers will get rich, people will get pissed, and certainly... it wont be fair to all parties. But we can hope for the best.. and most importantly the pilots from both groups should play nice in the sandbox.. I say welcome and lets work together for the good of our future... period. Mid Ex is a great group of folks.....

I hope da NPA is talking to the MEC up dar in MKE eh !! I'll give the union hall a jingle to see waaas up !
 
I'm very curious to see how peacably the pilot groups will work out the integration of seniority. My guess is the AirTran side will take a bath, inspite of being the host company.

And your guess is based on what . . . . . nothing.

AirTran has had 6 years of profitability and 20% annual growth. Our career expectations (key, according to ALPA) is for continued growth, quick upgrades, etc.

Midex has had five years of stagnation, furloughs, etc., and only recently got all the furloughees back and has hired a few pilots. In that same time, we more than doubled in size, and hired almost 900 pilots.

So, Crackpad, I ask you again . . . . what do you base your "guess" on, since it sure isn't based upon reason, logic, or past precedent? ;)
 
Last edited:
Hmm, how much cash does NPA have available in case that you may need to have a strike center are maybe even a strike? Lets see $0.

Ah, another "expert" spreading misinformation.

We certainly do have a strike fund. We also have a merger/contingency fund, both of which are now fully funded, and so we recently began reducing the assessment.

Why don't you stick to something you realy do have some knowlege of, like the nether parts of farm animals, and leave the dispensing of AirTran info to those of us who do know what we are talking about.


I'm interested in the direction ALPA takes after the first of the year with the new president.

Since most of your post was wrong, no reason to stop now, huh?

The President of the NPA is not going to be replaced with a management pilot, not unless we have hired too many "brain sturgeons" like yourself in the past 5 years. Guess we'll find out soon enough.:rolleyes:


.
 
Last edited:
I don't want to debate with Ty. He's one of 'the greats' on this board, IMHO.
Reason and logic never play a factor in this industry, but past precedent has shown pilots getting the shaft over and over. Midwests' pilot group is smaller and tighter than the rings around Uranus. If the same isn't true for Aitran, I fear the scales of fairness may be tipped in some local meeting place off Howell avenue. I have witnessed the seniority ladder kicked out inspite of having union represention.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom