Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AirTran emergency lndg.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Listen up everyone, you all have it wrong.

Terrorists used to reign holy terror upon us, now, for the same effect, they are reigning holy 'inconvienence' upon us.
They build a bomb out of liquids..No more liquids onboad. Heck, they didnt even have to buy plane tickets (at $39 each way)
Next, they will build a bomb out of a cell-phone or laptop and get 'caught' before going on to another plane..No more electronics onboard.
Baby bomb..No more babies on board. etc...etc...etc.

Question: If one of the people caught had full airport access, and they could have switched the bottles of water onboard, then why is the airlines still allowed to bring their own bottles onboard??

In order for us to take back our civil liberties that our government is taking away from us (by using excuses about terrorism) the only thing we pilots can do is divert each and every time there is something questionable (like water) onboard. Then we will convey a powerful message to upper management ($$$) about this, then they can take it up with our government. Maybe George and his buddies will do something different to stop the terrorism vs taking away our liberties (like racial profiling, or even god forbid, pull out of the middle east and just leave them alone).

Just my 3/4 cents (after taxes, pay cuts, dealer prep, and delivery fees)
 
Pilottodd2 said:
Listen up everyone, you all have it wrong.

In order for us to take back our civil liberties that our government is taking away from us (by using excuses about terrorism) the only thing we pilots can do is divert each and every time there is something questionable (like water) onboard. Then we will convey a powerful message to upper management ($$$) about this, then they can take it up with our government. Maybe George and his buddies will do something different to stop the terrorism vs taking away our liberties (like racial profiling, or even god forbid, pull out of the middle east and just leave them alone).

Just my 3/4 cents (after taxes, pay cuts, dealer prep, and delivery fees)

Appeasement - that will surely work. Are going to convert to Islam too? What about the rest of your infidel family?
 
FN FAL said:
One. An airline employee isn't making me drink anything.
It's the illegal beverage you brought on board. If you refused to drink it, I would then divert and enjoy leaving your stupid a$$ behind...tough guy!
 
32LT10 said:
So are they going to put these two heros up for the SSAA? (Scab Superior Airmanship Award)

Through death defying odds these pilots were able to land the plane under the threat that the water would explode in mid flight. Where do we find such brave and wonderful airmen?

yawn.......
 
jehtplane said:
What if it was a little old lady? Would still have the same opinion?

Jeht, your avatar is the only thing worthy on this entire thread. Thanks, it wasn't a complete waste of time.
 
Last edited:
Didn't United just divert a 767 for hand lotion (another banned item)? "Was that one of your super scabs or one of the 500 hour wonders that made the excellent decision to make an emergency landing due to a flippin hand lotion?" Did they make the SSAA nomination? Or are United's "super scabs & 500 hour wonders" different than the ones at Airtran?
 
32LT10 said:
Well no it was not "just hand lotion". It was many more issues other than hand lotion. It was the FAM's taking the lady down due to their perceived threat and once that happens they decide where the airplane lands.

What did the FAM's say about the water bottle on the Critter flight? Oh that is right FAM's are too afraid to ride Valuetran.

A United pilot making fun of another airline because they have scabs...

A United pilot making fun of another airline's safety record...

A United pilot making fun of the experience level of another airline's newhires...

You've got to be the biggest a$$ I've seen post here.
 
32LT10 said:
Well no it was not "just hand lotion". It was many more issues other than hand lotion. It was the FAM's taking the lady down due to their perceived threat and once that happens they decide where the airplane lands.

What did the FAM's say about the water bottle on the Critter flight? Oh that is right FAM's are too afraid to ride Valuetran.

I have several friends at United and none sound like you. You must be a pathetic a..hole to fly with.

What was your experience before you got hired by United ?
 
freightdogfred said:
A United pilot making fun of another airline because they have scabs...

A United pilot making fun of another airline's safety record...

A United pilot making fun of the experience level of another airline's newhires...

You've got to be the biggest a$$ I've seen post here.

I'm glad someone else can see the irony in his posts. Him (or her) being an a$$ is just plain obvious.
 
32LT10 said:
Well no it was not "just hand lotion". It was many more issues other than hand lotion. It was the FAM's taking the lady down due to their perceived threat and once that happens they decide where the airplane lands.

What did the FAM's say about the water bottle on the Critter flight? Oh that is right FAM's are too afraid to ride Valuetran.


Don't you think a similar threat could have been perceived on the Valutran’s divert? At least, Valuetran didn’t stop in the middle of the runway & effectively shut down all arrivals for the day … must have been some act of SSAA heroism. Or did the "super scabs & the 500-hr wonders" just give up in the middle of the airport (for their own good)?

Since when do the "FAM's decide where the airplane lands?" Do they have adequate weather/airport conditions/situational awareness/FOB/contact with anyone outside the airplane to make that determination? Perhaps, your channel 9 was their source of situational awareness hence, "this airplane lands in BOS or else..." Will you please share more of your experience with us at Valuetran?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top