Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
True, and untrue at the same time.Lear question for you, The cappy I flew with last week brought this up. She says someone on the negotiating committee told her because we were in mediated talks, and our board recommended TA2, that would be the new starting point of negotiations. TA2 that is, even though we shot it down. Something they learned at their ALPA training sessions. Is this even remotely true? Hoping no but.....
From a technical standpoint, to my understanding, the answer is "No", simply because 3 of the BoD members has been flushed, meaning that vote no longer restricts us as a majority now weren't even in office to have voted for it.
That said, negotiations are going to be tough, because Tossi (the arbitrator) won't be happy to see a huge re-start throwing away most of what was done in T.A. 2. He will certainly want to start with T.A. 2 and will tell both sides they need to work to solve the inequities to get to a workable document that will be ratified.
He won't like hearing that the inequities encompass almost the entire document. Section 1 is a non-starter with the changes in Scope and lack of successorship language for fragmentation.
Compensation needs to come up nearly 10% across the board just to come *CLOSE* to industry standard and that just matches BANKRUPTCY rates, not anything pre-9/11.
Scheduling needs a complete re-write of the reserve section, starting with our current reserve system, adding transparency to the process, and putting limits on SAP I, II and daily trades that are REASONABLE.
Hotels is completely unacceptable, given what everyone has been working under in terms of declining quality (as in, Oh My God they're nasty).
Not to mention retirement and insurance...
Tossi isn't going to be happy to hear that and will likely push pretty hard in all likelihood to avoid sweeping changes.
Fortunately, for us, the BoD doesn't have to agree to anything they don't want to. Unfortunately, for us, Tossi can decide we are being "unrealistic" and elect NOT to give us a cooling off period or release into self-help which, let's face it, is our only weapon.
The hardest job the NC has is to convince Tossi that current book plus COLA is THE starting point moving forward. NOT T.A. 2 which was REJECTED soundly. If they can get past that in a timely fashion, we might see some progress. If not, this will likely stall out for a long time to come.
Fortunately, with the downturn in the economy and the resulting downturn in hiring and movement in the list, those on reserve don't get hosed with T.A. 2's draconian reserve rules while we wait for something better.
Not really, No.Lear, you getting back here soon?
Another 3-5 months just to get the case to arbitration, THEN up to a year or more to get the arbitrator's decision, and then, IF the arbitrator rules in my favor (which I believe he will), the company can still appeal it and put it off several more months before being forced into it.
Basically I'm out a minimum of another year to two years... GOT to find something with more time off - I'm missing my son's toddler years, and NO amount of money can replace that.