Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airtran and their "500 PIC part 121" requirement?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The fact is alot of part-135 operators fly more hours a year and to many more different airports than 121 carriers. On top of that we do our own flight planning,transportation arrangements, over flight permits,catering not to mention we are baggage handlers. We get called out in the middle of the night to go some where we have never heard of in the worst weather. All within 1 hour or 2 of the call.... On top of that we have part-135 regs,part-91 regs to deal with.. We also have atc delays,busy airports. Annual 293 a/b,299 and 6 month 297 check rides.......... So tell m again how a 121 guy has more experience than a 135 guy. OH !!! now I remember why I hate part-135..
 
I know how fustrated you 135/91 guys are. I have two friends at AT and neither of them could do a thing to help me. There are two issues in play here.

  • The 500 PIC policy
  • 121 vs 135
As to the policy, everyone has their own personal opinions. Mine is that Klaus likes airline pilots. (We all most closely identify with the choices we have made ouselves) as to the military part, the veterans in your workforce are a more closely-knit group than ex charter or corporate, and simply would not allow such a policy without the "or military equavelant" phrasing.

As to the 121 vs 135 part, I'm one of those folks who have done both. (With years of international command experience on the charter side.) Here's my stupid opinion. It's their company and they can hire who they like. Are they depriving themselves of many talented aviators? You bet. Is whining about it on flightinfo going to help? No.

To my peers who believe that being a 121 pilot makes them a better aviator: Get real. Just because you went down this path doesn't mean it's the best choice. There are some folks in Learjets, Gulfstreams, Hawkers and Cessna's doing some flying that would amaze you.

To those of you plying your trade in the 135 arena: 121 is a totally different animal. Six months ago I thought the differences would be small. They are enourmous. Not harder, not easier, different. If you really want that job at the majors, you've got do everything you can to imrove your qualifications, even if it means taking a huge paycut. I did, and I'm having the time of my life.
 
and HR said...

GogglesPisano said,

"There are plenty of retards who have managed their way into corporate flight departments because they happen to be someone's nephew. In the 121 environment, you still have to pass a rigid checkride in order to be PIC -- notwithstanding seniority.

I see their reasoning: 121 experience means you generally fly more take-offs and landings into busier airports. You have experience dealing with ATC delays, CRM, FA's, unions, schedulers, dispatchers, 121 regs, Feds in the jumpseat ... It is a more similar environment to what Air Tran pilots work in than corporate.
(Since I have 2500 hours 121 PIC Jet, I think it's an outstanding requirement)"

Goggles you are so full of it, you haven't got a clue...

-No relatives have gotten into Part 121 operations because Daddy works there right?

-We don't go to busy airports or 4500 ft runways or 60 foot wide runways, or unfamiliar airports and environments all the time right? Going only to busy airports all the time is really tough right? Those 10000 ft runways are sure a challenge...Following that 10-9 chart chart is really difficult right?

-We never have ATC delays right, "Attention all 135 aircraft, you are all cleared for takeoff, we'll just have the airlines wait"

-Yeah we don't have CRM right? I have jumpseated on AA and UPS and see no difference between our procedures and your elite 121 procedures

-No dispatchers? Oh yeah I am the dispatcher

-No FAs Oh yeah I am the FA

-No janitor, oh yeah I am the janitor. Add on ramp agent, customer service rep, catering service and complaint hotline, cook, etc...
-No 121 regs? Oh yeah we have 135 that are sooooo different but I'm sure I couldn't learn 121, that would take a real genius

-Feds in the jumpseat? Oh yeah we never have to deal with over-zealous FAA friendly FEDS coming over to "help" right?

Goggles you have no clue of what you are talking about. To think that an airline like Airtran can not train a Captain with over 2000 hour PIC in jet and turboprops is really incredible. How can Southwest do it? In the end it just shows in the arrogance of your workforce, just listen to how pompous and ignorant you sound Mr. Goggles.
Airtran, however, has every right to do it. In the end, your pilot force will be the loosers. Your are skipping over a lot of great customer service leaders that happen to be great pilots. Personally, I would not like to work for a company that is so unwise and shortsighted.
By the way Ty, I think it was YOU! who screwed up your training and killed it for the rest of us. Thank you! (just kidding Ty) But it is true that from now on Airtran will be missing gems such as yourself. LOL

I know Stephanie (who is a sweatheart) over at Airtran HR and she told me that it was a few folks that did poorly in training supposedly with Part 135/91 background.

 
Last edited:
Swerpipe said:
GogglesPisano said,

"There are plenty of retards who have managed their way into corporate flight departments because they happen to be someone's nephew. In the 121 environment, you still have to pass a rigid checkride in order to be PIC -- notwithstanding seniority.

I see their reasoning: 121 experience means you generally fly more take-offs and landings into busier airports. You have experience dealing with ATC delays, CRM, FA's, unions, schedulers, dispatchers, 121 regs, Feds in the jumpseat ... It is a more similar environment to what Air Tran pilots work in than corporate.
(Since I have 2500 hours 121 PIC Jet, I think it's an outstanding requirement)"

Goggles you are so full of it, you haven't got a clue...

-No relatives have gotten into Part 121 operations because Daddy works there right?

-We don't go to busy airports or 4500 ft runways or 60 foot wide runways, or unfamiliar airports and environments all the time right? Going only to busy airports all the time is really tough right? Those 10000 ft runways are sure a challenge...Following that 10-9 chart chart is really difficult right?

-We never have ATC delays right, "Attention all 135 aircraft, you are all cleared for takeoff, we'll just have the airlines wait"

-Yeah we don't have CRM right? I have jumpseated on AA and UPS and see no difference between our procedures and your elite 121 procedures

-No dispatchers? Oh yeah I am the dispatcher

-No FAs Oh yeah I am the FA

-No janitor, oh yeah I am the janitor. Add on ramp agent, customer service rep, catering service and complaint hotline, cook, etc...
-No 121 regs? Oh yeah we have 135 that are sooooo different but I'm sure I couldn't learn 121, that would take a real genius

-Feds in the jumpseat? Oh yeah we never have to deal with over-zealous FAA friendly FEDS coming over to "help" right?

Goggles you have no clue of what you are talking about. To think that an airline like Airtran can not train a Captain with over 2000 hour PIC in jet and turboprops is really incredible. How can Southwest do it? In the end it just shows in the arrogance of your workforce, just listen to how pompous and ignorant you sound Mr. Goggles.
Airtran, however, has every right to do it. In the end, your pilot force will be the loosers. Your are skipping over a lot of great customer service leaders that happen to be great pilots. Personally, I would not like to work for a company that is so unwise and shortsighted.
By the way Ty, I think it was YOU! who screwed up your training and killed it for the rest of us. Thank you! (just kidding Ty) But it is true that from now on Airtran will be missing gems such as yourself. LOL

I know Stephanie (who is a sweatheart) over at Airtran HR and she told me that it was a few folks that did poorly in training supposedly with Part 135/91 background.

Sounds like I hit a raw nerve. Sorry. My point was that Air Tran is a Part 121 airline, and has probably found that pilots with 121 experience are better candidates. Yelling at me on a weboard isn't going to change a thing.

I know 135 pilots work hard -- I've been there.

PS: I don't work for Air Tran.
 
Last edited:
Not really

Goggles,

It probably sounds a lot worse in writing than the way I feel. In any case nothing we can do so who cares. I don't like it when pilots get discriminated for their backgrounds without a fair shot. It's not just the airlines, corporate and charter companies do it as well. Sorry if I sounded too personal, just to spice it up a bit.
So long...
 
Bill Nelson said:
The requirement is NOT hard and fast. I have a friend who interviewed about 6 weeks ago and doesn't have any 121 time and is civilian only background.

(He has a buddy who is in the training department so maybe that was the deciding qualification)
AGAIN I SAY (yes, I'm yelling to get your attention) You don't have to have the 500 121 time to get an interview. I can testify based on first hand knowledge.

Quit complaining about it anyway, your opinion isn't going to change their policy.
 
doer42 said:
I don't see on JB's website that they require 1000 PIC 121 turbine...from the website, the requirements are:

• 1000 hours turbine in airplanes
• 1000 hours Pilot in Command Time*
* PIC logged IAW FAR part 1, *Jetblue will only consider PIC time when the Pilot has signed for the aircraft.

And no, I don't work for JB.
What does this mean to you? A flight instructor signs for a C172 before a training flight with his student. Think that applies here? Jet Blue (and AirTran) is referring to signing for a Part 121 aircraft carrying passengers or freight in which you are in charge of an entire crew and its payload. Not a 172, not a King Air 90, not a Part 135 Navajo with 5 passengers. Airline operations. Period.

Granted...the JB website could be a bit more clear on the issue, but in the real world it is Part 121 PIC Turbine that large jet airlines are looking for.
 
Part 1 definition

Hey Don,

I have talked to the JBlue recruiter and they consider Part 1 turbine PIC from a 135/91 background. Infact, they have many guys with corporate/charter backgrounds. Signing for the aircraft or Part 1 definition refers to being assigned as the PIC. In other words, if you are typed and flying on the left you may/may not be the "PIC". There is only an assigned PIC on any flight, the person ultimately responsible and he can seat on the left or right it doesn't matter.
 
Fly-By-Cable said:
Ok, here's the reason for AirTran 500 121PIC requirement:

AirTran training and especially checking is very intense...that is doubled when you go through upgrade.
Now that's funny!
 
Hi!

I heard that JetBlue intentionally want a variety of experience in the cockpit, and they try to get 1/3 mil, 1/3 121 and 1/3 91/135.

Cliff
YIP
 

Latest resources

Back
Top