General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No need to be so formal; and you do? Even the MDW web page says nothing about any proprietary gates for AirTran. Like I've been saying all along, the ATA gates are going to be split between two or three carriers. It just so happens that the City has given you a green light to schedule earlier than any other carriers due to that master negotiator, Bob Fornaro. Here's the present gate lineup, if you'd care to dispute it, be my guest genius:FLB717 said:Lowecur,
You have no idea how my airline is run, how we use gates, what gates we can and can not use, so bugger your uninformed over analized opinon, sir.
lowecur said:It just so happens that the City has given you a green light to schedule earlier than any other carriers due to that master negotiator, Bob Fornacate:
Its spelled Fornaro you A-hole, how about showing a little respect!
cl65capt said:You guys are right. I don't even know Bob, and I'm sure he is a standup guy. My apologies.lowecur said:Its spelled Fornaro you A-hole, how about showing a little respect!![]()
cl65capt said:He only shows "respect" to those who grease his a-hole with some Embraer lube. What a tool.lowecur said:
Its spelled Fornaro you A-hole, how about showing a little respect!![]()
By the way, it's not your airline....you just work there.FLB717 said:Lowecur,
Grow up.
I'm not buying your logic. First of all SWA is going to have it's hands full with PHL if UAIR doesn't liquidate, and MDW if they don't get any extra gates. Add the problems they are having with the Wright amendment, and that will leave them with only DFW to expand in Dallas.habubuaza said:I also don't put too much weight in what many analysts say however here is what I believe. I believe that Airtran is going to be in a very precarious situation because of some very important reasons.
I think what you really mean is that you hope AirTran will be in a precarious position.habubuaza said:I believe that Airtran is going to be in a very precarious situation because of some very important reasons.
.First and foremost Airtran is going to be in competition with Southwest in Chicago. That can not be underestimated.
Sure, they can put pressure on us, but I don't think that they are going to make as big a deal of it as you do. See the above. How many balls do you think they want to keep in the air? Smart competitors pick and choose their battles, and SWA is a smart competitor. Delta, on the other hand, has not been. They have eroded their cash position form $6 Bil to $1 Bil trying to hold on to "market share" in markets they can't profitably serve. I have been pointing that out for three years now. I also predicted that it would be Mullin's undoing . . . and it was.Southwest is very capable of putting tremendous pressure on Airtran and I dare to say can run them out of any market of their choosing.
Southwest is that good. They can put increased pressure on them out of BWI if they choose to force Airtran to divert resources and attention away from Chicago or in addition to Chicago.
Delta looks like they are starting to get themselves on better financial footing, albeit not out of the woods yet but certainly in a better position to compete with Airtran out of Atlanta. [?QUOTE]
See the above. Delta can continue to lose money fighting us for the low-fare customer, or focus their efforts on making money. Right now, I would say that they had better focus on making money where they can, or they will go Chap. 11. That should be obvious.
This is just silly. You could substitute any carrier's name here.Jetblue, Southwest, Song and UsAir (yes UsAir) will keep Airtran at bay on the east coast. Any Midwest expansion will be tempered by Southwest's dominance. Expansion to the west will be fierce with America West, Ted, and even Frontier.
Your last statement reveals how little knowlege you have about AirTran. Actually, we have been reducing the hub-and-spoke structure. In the past three years, we have increased the number of flights by nearly 50%, yet Atlanta has grown by only about 28%. More and more directs are added each month.Airtran has also expanded as a hub and spoke carrier. A model that has some troubling characteristics and they are increasing their operations based on a hub and spoke system.
Don;t worry about us. Profitable in 9 out of the past 10 quarters during some of the toughest years in the industry . . . . I think we'll do just fine, and as for that competition from USAirways, please . . . if you are thinking of making it as an analyst in this industry, my advice is don't quit your day job.
.....FLB717 said:Lowecur,
Yes it is MY AIRLINE. Not only do I own stock in the company, but I take ownership in how I run my aircraft. I also own stock in AAI, and I don't consider it my airline. When I fly to ROC, I try to be pleasant to all the crew members and fellow pax, not because I consider myself an owner, but because it's the right thing to do.![]()
It takes two to wrestle in the mud. Did you know even a broken clock is right twice a day? Another Euphemism from another genius at AirTran.FLB717 said:Les..., I mean Lowecur,
Not only have you missed the point, I see talking with you is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a while you realize the pig likes it. Have a good day.
lowecur said:It takes two to wrestle in the mud. Did you know even a broken clock is right twice a day? Another Euphemism from another genius at AirTran.![]()
![]()
Oooo, low blow, Ty. I used to like you.Ty Webb said:Well, at least this genius had the testicular fortitude to identify a goal, pursue it, stick to it, accomplish it, and enjoy it, instead of becoming a "wannabe" who hangs out on a website dedicated to pilots, spending his time trying to annoy those who accomplished what he hasn't.![]()