Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
bobbysamd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 5,710
TAB P-F-T
Sure, it's humorous. They ran the same stupid banner in last month's Flying as well. That issue also had an article about the "company."
Tell the furloughees that airline hiring has resumed.
Now, I have another reason to scream about age discrimination. I'm 51 and they take people only 50 and under!
TAB P-F-T in and of itself is bad enough. It just slays me to see a heretofore reputable magazine stoop to running such blatant multi-page ads and call them "articles."
Sure, it's humorous. They ran the same stupid banner in last month's Flying as well. That issue also had an article about the "company."
Tell the furloughees that airline hiring has resumed.
Now, I have another reason to scream about age discrimination. I'm 51 and they take people only 50 and under!
TAB P-F-T in and of itself is bad enough. It just slays me to see a heretofore reputable magazine stoop to running such blatant multi-page ads and call them "articles."
VelcroJetDriver
Active member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2002
- Posts
- 31
The article in FLYING doesn't surprise me. Although overall it is a good GA magazine, their editorialists have in the past (mid-90's) reasoned that pay-for-training is justified. They also once had a two-page story about a Lear driver who scabbed at CAL, didn't like airline flying, and went back to flying the Lear. Made him out to be a hero.
Before you take out a huge loan to go to TAB, or another one of the huge flight schools consider this. The monthly payment on a $80,000 at 10% is $772 each month. Try comming up with that much each month as a CFI. Also, that total cost of the loan will be about $185k. Pretty expensive for some King Air time.
Funny.
I happen to live in Deland where TAB keeps their a/c and thier not so large flight school. Those King Airs don't fly that often and many are not in airworthy condition. Something smells funny about that whole operation. BTW, the guys there all walk aroung in airline uniforms, hat and all. OBSURD! Total joke of a program.
TAB = minor leage before going to Gulfstream.
I happen to live in Deland where TAB keeps their a/c and thier not so large flight school. Those King Airs don't fly that often and many are not in airworthy condition. Something smells funny about that whole operation. BTW, the guys there all walk aroung in airline uniforms, hat and all. OBSURD! Total joke of a program.
TAB = minor leage before going to Gulfstream.
bobbysamd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 5,710
Don't pay the TAB (sorry)
Sure, it smells funny. Nice to hear a first-hand view of the place. I will say that uniforms wouldn't bother me; I wore a uniform when I was an FSI instructor and had no qualms about it. No caps, though; that sounds funky.
Let's say you go through the program at somewhat low time, say 500 hours. You leave with the 100 hours of turbine multi in your logbook. Let's assume further that it is completely legal time. Probably not PIC but SIC. You send in your resume to some commuter, hoping it will get attention from the H.R. pukes. They'll see the time and will scratch their head, "how could this applicant get 100 hours of turbine multi in a scheduled operation with such low time?" They'll delve into it further and figure out the semi-quasi-P-F-T aspect, and will know it was paid for.
Sure, there are plenty of hoops to jump through to get to the goal, and you have to jump through the hoops in sequence. Trying to circumvent the system and routine generally gets you nowhere.
It's frustrating. I was plenty frustrated years ago when I saw that commuters wanted 500 hours of multi and I was impatient to get it. Eventually, I did, by getting a job and biding my time. And, I got interviews.
Read the article about the place in the May Flying. It bills itself as producing FOs ready for the line. Whatever advantage there may be is automatically negated because every new-hire has to go through specific initial training at his/her company. No school, in any industry or profession, can boast that its graduates are company-ready. Every company has its own way of doing things and every new-hire has to be trained in its procedures. The best a school can do is familiarize its trainees with generic procedures, which may be completely different at a specific company.
I could absolutely live with the notion of a TAB Express if it just was a sort of pilot finishing school and billed itself as such. But, still, the advantage gained would be doubtful at best.
Sure, it smells funny. Nice to hear a first-hand view of the place. I will say that uniforms wouldn't bother me; I wore a uniform when I was an FSI instructor and had no qualms about it. No caps, though; that sounds funky.
Let's say you go through the program at somewhat low time, say 500 hours. You leave with the 100 hours of turbine multi in your logbook. Let's assume further that it is completely legal time. Probably not PIC but SIC. You send in your resume to some commuter, hoping it will get attention from the H.R. pukes. They'll see the time and will scratch their head, "how could this applicant get 100 hours of turbine multi in a scheduled operation with such low time?" They'll delve into it further and figure out the semi-quasi-P-F-T aspect, and will know it was paid for.
Sure, there are plenty of hoops to jump through to get to the goal, and you have to jump through the hoops in sequence. Trying to circumvent the system and routine generally gets you nowhere.
It's frustrating. I was plenty frustrated years ago when I saw that commuters wanted 500 hours of multi and I was impatient to get it. Eventually, I did, by getting a job and biding my time. And, I got interviews.
Read the article about the place in the May Flying. It bills itself as producing FOs ready for the line. Whatever advantage there may be is automatically negated because every new-hire has to go through specific initial training at his/her company. No school, in any industry or profession, can boast that its graduates are company-ready. Every company has its own way of doing things and every new-hire has to be trained in its procedures. The best a school can do is familiarize its trainees with generic procedures, which may be completely different at a specific company.
I could absolutely live with the notion of a TAB Express if it just was a sort of pilot finishing school and billed itself as such. But, still, the advantage gained would be doubtful at best.
Last edited:
qwerty
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2002
- Posts
- 159
I know a couple of people who went there and are very pleased with the training they got. They fly for the commuters now. That is what most of us kids are trying to do, right?
They are airline pilots...and I still spend 12hrs at the airport to log 4hrs dual given in a 152, on a good day.
who knows..who knows
They are airline pilots...and I still spend 12hrs at the airport to log 4hrs dual given in a 152, on a good day.
who knows..who knows
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
