One more hypothetical which I am sure will be ignored...
Many people mention insurance costs as justification for this rule. The largest cost increase for your company is likely to be: Getting married and having children.
Under your way of thinking what is to stop a company from insisting on remaining childless and unmarried as a condition of continued employment?
Many people mention insurance costs as justification for this rule. The largest cost increase for your company is likely to be: Getting married and having children.
Under your way of thinking what is to stop a company from insisting on remaining childless and unmarried as a condition of continued employment?